lotmr
lotmr
lotmr

No, it’s not “fucked.”

Leather (the real stuff, not bonded leather, which is basically collagen particle board) is an inefficient pain in the ass to use in large scale manufacturing. The move away from leather probably has as much to do with Volvo just wanting to be done with it as it does shifting consumer preference.

It is literally always a scam with that guy somewhere, he is the greatest grifter of this generation. That god for the natural born citizenship clause of the constitution, at least we’ll be spared President Elon in thirty years.

That’s true, but it’s the 300 for me because it distinctly still looks pretty much like that same car that was exciting and new when I was in high school (I’m 34 now.) I mean, the 300 still represents some design language from the late 90s! It’s crazy!

The 300 would like a word with you.

The bridge really ought to be raised,

Oof. That is like a world's fair exhibit of the future from the 60s.

Why? That looks a high schoolers rendering after a few weeks using blender

Single player games have to be easy and cater to you?

Souls games aren’t single player. There’s a built-in help system. Or you can just grind out some levels. This obviously doesn’t apply to Sekiro. That’s a git gud game.

Plus they both have a ~1500 lb payload capacity (and up to 5,000 lb towing on the Santa Cruz.

What you said is kinda blaming the victim here... even if the driver wasn’t signalling a turn the car slowing down with its brake lights on was more than enough to alert anybody behind to slow down so it’s 100% the truck driver’s fault.

It looks like the truck and the car behind (maybe a 3 series or similar profile?) were racing/hooning with each other. Both the truck and the trailing car move into the center and appear to think they’re going to fly past the Accord on the left, despite the Accord turning left.

the driver of the accord wasnt using his indicators. Not that it makes it alright to flew through a neighborhood like that.

Acting on principles of socialism: advocating for the social ownership of private (not personal!) property; the elimination of class; the elimination of surplus value theft; worker ownership of the means of producing services and goods

It’s just a willful misrepresentation of Socialism to imply that it’s mandated poverty for everyone. It’s a VERY FOX NEWS slant. As long as you’re actually contributing according to your income, then guess what? You’re still participating in socialism! Ta daaaaaa.... But firm grasps on issues and calm understanding

I’ve never really been bothered by the champagne socialists. You do you so long as you keep spreading the word and don’t bitch about taxes.

No there are 3 groups:

- normal people who think it’s nice he was able to buy a house in the city he lives in and understand how much money he makes because it’s been transparent the whole time.

- always online parasocial leftist weirdos who feel like they can dictate how and where he lives his life (he doesn’t know who

bread and roses. everyone deserves to look nice.