I can find you many a AAA title though that has laughable VA. While some are good(I don’t play Mass Effect so can’t comment there) many are equally as bad, uncoordinated or just plain weird. I did exaggerate here some to make my point, but still I feel like it is likely there are many folks who could give a good,…

Yes I did stretch that a little, but in terms of voice acting, there are likely many many qualified individuals out there who would like you said use this as an opportunity. Thanks for the response.

Out of curiosity, is there anything that would prevent them from just getting random scabs to do it instead? Not to discredit voice-acting in games, but some seem like just about anyone could do it.

During this election that is absolutely untrue. There is a pool, estimated at 8-10% that fall into the disenfranchised category still at this point. Many of them are well informed, which is exactly why they are in that category.

As a charter member of the old school stuff, I say that yes, this is how it was when it first started. We used to compare game boys at school to see who had what until someone got a guide and ruined it. Now I put on my old man pants and just say, kids these days. The little assholes don’t know how to have fun anymore.

That would make him a good investor. And I don’t think that being a ‘good businessman’ translates to the Presidency. But the problem that I keep coming back to is this. The last candid interaction I have seen from Clinton is her seeming disgusted by a real question from a teenager in Minnesota questioning her claims…

So, what you have described is every CEO ever, minus the outright illegal stuff that ousted several five years or so back. In other words, he’s a good businessman. Listen, I don’t think either is a good choice, I caucused for Bernie. But realistically, I’ll take a complete douche who may not be on the take, versus…

That’s a slightly flawed argument though. Unless you say that it indicates Trump will try to use government funds to pay his debts. It implies directly that Clinton is open and accepting of bribes.

I think you missed the part where they aren’t just standing there playing the game. And the part where Trump is a presidential candidate so why the fuck not a candy crush tv show.

This is getting weaker the farther you try to push it. When you said that you weren’t taking them for anything. Listen, you need to spend more time on your atheism if you wanna use it to troll POTENTIAL Christians. You don’t even have a full grasp on the concepts. Also for the future, try to understand that the word…

Actually it doesn’t. Things you cannot verify are not part of objective reality. So, unless you are tracking this person down. It isn’t.

If you know what you mean, then use your big kid words to describe your feelings better. It isn’t that hard. See, the thing about text is you can’t just change what those words mean. If it isn’t what you meant, then don’t type it. But the phrase ‘announcing thoughts you aren’t acting on’ pretty strictly defines your…

Also, for being a people writer, she sure doesn’t have much in the archive. Exactly one thing, published after the Trump article?

Because the player accepts it.

Go back and read your second comment again. It’s pretty straightforward. You have since tried to claim that’s not what those words meant, that the post that got you and I started was directed at me when it wasn’t and twice questioned my reading comprehension even your own words cannot back you up. Wanna call it a day,…

Sure it can be, but not in the way you used during your rebuttal. You started with an attempt to demolish any value in the OP, then followed up by explaining why you felt it had no value, thanks to your assumption that nothing was being done. You have crafted this over our last few comments in order to try to cover…

Yes, I do, and you didn’t bother to comprehend mine.(I know you could have had you bothered to pay attention) You have no way to know if that individual is sincere or not. My argument here is that you have done more to push them to the not. So either you care about the cause and want help, you care about the cause but…

I’m sorry, your counter is that there are people that actually do stuff? Your excuse for being a hateful prick is that this random person, who may still go out and donate to a legal fund or picket if they happen to be close enough, is that they are commenting at this moment instead of actually doing anything? You do…

And you have set one high enough that you may never find compatriots for whatever cause you pursue. Or you are just a dick. Based on your commenting history, I lean towards arrogant dick. But you will still end up in the former category with that approach. Sometimes you have to accept a hand even if it isn’t quite the…

The fact that someone isn’t being a heartless bastard and shows any form of concern about this. Thank you for fulfilling your asshattedness. Asshatedness? Eh, either way, ruling confirmed.