loraleeann1
Schweeps
loraleeann1

I will literally step out of the shower, soaking wet like a baby seal, to turn the radio off when she comes on with her stupid voice. Ugh. You are on RADIO. I feel like one of the job requirements should be "Voice that does not suck."

COULD YOU BE TALKING ABOUT ZOE CHASE AND HER TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE VOICE?!!??!

I don't know it's a dealbreaker in a vacuum, but I doubt I would be able to stand my husband's voice for extended periods of time if it were super high. Also, maybe I'm missing something, but isn't the pitch of one's voice someone has SOME level of control over (not saying this guy needs to change to fit himself into

I kind of love this lady.

That sounds like a terrible pamphlet. Guarantee it's neither ranch dressing nor blue cheese dressing that gave her diabetes (hint: it's the carbs!)

My most embarrassing story from my time as a waitress was when we had a special soft shell crab on the menu. My table called me over and asked me how to eat it and I, being 17 and never eaten soft shell crab before, said "I think you eat it like regular crab and get the meat out from the shell, but let me check." I

Yes, let's all ignore health benefits because YOU are allergic!

The craziest thing I've read is that movie theatre popcorn used to be cooked in coconut oil Which is delicious and one of the most nutritious fats out there. And then everyone freaked out about saturated fat and they switched to "heathly" partially hydrogenated oils! FAN-EFFING-TASTIC, health people!

Alright, I might be a weirdo paleo person, but even I cannot deny the deliciousness of this stuff on a toasted eggo waffle.

Say what you will, I effing love her hair.

Maybe I'm pregnant, but this was so scary to watch this morning when I saw it on the news that I started tearing up. How absolutely frightening must this had been!

I always joke that the best part of being married is not planning a wedding any more, but I think "Constantly fielding inquiries re: diet/workout plans" is a close second. Now the only thing because care about is when I'm going to have a baby.

So I always had a soft spot for Lindsay and this show is just....making me struggle. I think she's just so selfish in a way that must be so exhausting for everyone around her. Like you'll never get a thank you for putting up with her bullshit, so it makes sense that all of her "support system" are people she pays.

Mayo Clinic is not the same thing as a study. Give me a study, actual science, that proves your point rather than bullshit websites appealing to the lowest common denominator. Copying & pasting from above, since apparently you've forgotten the only actual scientific study linked here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm

Still can't find an actual study, huh? Nice try. Keep clinging to your outdated beliefs, buddy.

You still can't prove that it's exactly 3,500 calories to a pound, like you keep stating. I never said you WOULDN'T lose weight at an extreme calorie deficit. But the study you linked to you ADMITTED was tainted by cheating. So why are you paying attention at all to the results - find a study that shows that it

I never dodged it. I acknowledged that you WILL lose weight if you eat 400 calories day. What you refuse to acknowledge is that the quality of those 400 calories matters. You will lose more weight if you eat 400 calories of protein than if you eat 400 calories of glucose. IT IS NOT A PERFECT 3,500 calorie deficit

Nothing there proved that it was 3,500 calories to a pound. In fact, it proved the exact opposite. Everyone in the study "slashed 750 calories a day" and exercise 90 minutes a week (about 1,000 calories a week, likely more, but let's be conservative). At six months, these people should have lost 42 pounds, if we're

We're not talking about water weight, if we were talking about water weight, then low carb diets would be EVEN BETTER at helping people lose weight because of the amount of water used in digesting carbohydrates. We're talking about pounds of fat. And here's a study that proves my point. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm

No, you're literally, scientifically incorrect. A 3500 calories deficit does not result in exactly one pound of weight loss. You are contradicting yourself in what you're writing ("People lose at the rate of 3500 calories deficit = 1 pound. They lose even faster than that...) - which is it? Is it exactly 3500