Pontiac G3 Wave. Suzuki never sold any car in Canada named Liana, and the Aerio sold here looked like this:

Pontiac G3 Wave, to be exact. Here in Canada, it was originally sold as simply Pontiac Wave, then as Pontiac G3 Wave, then simply Pontiac G3. It seems that 2009 was the only year that it was called a G3 Wave, so it must be a 2009 model.

Herschel!

Am I the only one who doesn't know what Apple CarPlay or Android Auto are and what they do? I was hoping (expecting, even) that this article would finally answer that question.

The Sultan is an IS.

Are you insinuating that the Albany Emperor is a 100% accurate, true-to-life representation of a Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham (or just Brougham)? If so, it'd be named a Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham. It'd have turn signals below the headlights, and the grille and front bumper would drop down together. The brake lights…

No. With very few exceptions, NOTHING in GTA is a true-life replica or 100% accurate representation of anything. EVERYTHING is a parody. If you can't comprehend that, you're missing the point of most of GTA's writing and its concepts.

A Buick GSX front clip should bolt right on to a 442 or whatever A body you choose. The Sabre Turbo's front is most like it, IMO. It definitely has a Cutlass-ish rear bumper, though.

I think for the Stratum, you just need to put some R32 headlights and some different taillights onto an old Taurus wagon.

LOL, great minds. I dunno how I missed your post before posting mine. Anyway, Van By Night was the best.

Joke

Just before last week's episode, I was thinking to myself "We haven't seen a Krieger Rush van for a while". I was not disappointed.

This is the same YT account that brought us the Jetta with a VR6 up front and a turbocharged W8 in the rear.

And why does Smart Tint use Conan O'Brien's hair for a logo?

Pretty sure th...

Finally. It took seven replies, but someone finally responded who knows the difference between being impressive and looking impressive.

Congratulations, you're our lucky sixth commenter giving the same damn reply.

Is there some part of the explanation that I've given four frigging times already that you didn't catch?

FFS.

As I've said repeatedly, I don't dispute that it is impressive. What I'm saying is that on the face of it, it doesn't look impressive. The photo doesn't show any internal damage, or the fact that it was caused by a laser a mile away.