In some respects they’ve improved. Until two or three years ago the Mail routinely ran paparazzi pictures of twelve or thirteen year old girls in bathing suits with headlines like ‘All grown up’.

I hate that Americans—because anything British is fancy and high brow—are treating the daily mail as a reputable news source instead of a tabloid.

This is Daily Fail standard.

this seems to be another one of those types that sound rational for a while, and make a string of normal-sounding posts only to occasionally fixate irrationally on a person here and there and harass them for random inexplicable reasons. maybe someone who regularly goes off their psych meds? who knows. anyway as i’ve…

it’s a troll who harasses women on feminist sites for fun. what more do you expect from such?

girls are just supposed to get along and make do, right?

When will white people address their culture of violence?

Instead, they wanted some kind of space or club to learn skills...

Realistically if she wants to make money as a recording artist she pretty much has to tour. There really isn’t much money in albums for musicians these days. Its also hard to effectively promote albums without touring.

Your logical fallacies are and Straw Man and False Equivalence!

The Daily Mail once did have a headline about the time Prince Charles got lost on a hike, knocked on the door of a farmhouse, the housewife opened it and fainted dead away at the sight of him. But it WAS Prince Charles. Not a lotta excitement in Yorkshire.

In your sons case, do you feel like there’s something specific about a single-gender school that would have helped your son, or would it have been equally helpful if it had been just a small school that focused on kids’ individual needs, “got” they way your son worked, helped him to focus, etc?

This is exactly the philosophy of my staunch Republican grandma who voted for Trump and wants to cut public programs/ACA/welfare. She lives in housing subsidized by the federal government and pays much lower rent than most people in Southern California. When I’ve brought this up to her and pointed out her hypocrisy…

I feel like i read the same study you did ages ago. In it, I believe it found that boys actually perform BETTER having girls around, while girls perform better without their male counterparts. It was very interesting.

This is why so many people voted for — and continue to support — Trump even as he promised to gut the programs they depend on for survival. They honestly believe there’s a fundamental difference between the “good” programs for (white) people in “legitimate need” that keep them afloat and the programs that exist to…

Did you not read the article at all? Because it sure seems like you didn’t read the fucking article.

“...DCPS officials held a meeting with over 100 girls of color, and they did not hear that they wanted an all-girls school. Instead, they wanted some kind of space or club to learn skills and to talk about their days.”

While I understand that males are underperforming and this is their way of trying to deal with that, I will say as someone who attended single sex education, and who’s high school guy friends went to an all-boys school I would say without a doubt that I would never send my son to an all-boys school. I always found…

Don’t most studies show that girls benefit more from sex-segregated schools then boys do? *wanders off to find source*