The irony of the “oh the poor shitty techbro” take is that they barred entry long before the techbro/weekend party crowd would have hit.
The irony of the “oh the poor shitty techbro” take is that they barred entry long before the techbro/weekend party crowd would have hit.
I don’t think I have to rub too many brain cells to find a reason to hate Burning Man.
Today in randomly targeted, vaguely populist snark: why you should hate Burning Man, Chris Rock, and Diplo (whoever the hell that is).
“with Chris Rock making jokes about how much he wants a cold brew”
Considering people drive there and they burn down a large wooden thing... I think that ship of “leave no trace” sailed years ago.
“Heavy rains put out Burning Man”
If this project isn’t already underway, what are we even DOING here?
I do wonder how much stuff they left behind - vehicles, tents, entire living at spaces. So much for the “leave no trace” mantra.
This is the buddy movie we need.
I’m sure you’re right...it’ll be pretty interesting seeing how she deals with the accounting.
Where are you? East Timor?
This artice is mean-spirited.
$20,000 per spawnling. They can afford the bannana...and maybe a coconut
I guess she could do what countless others have done when needing money...work. Bitch looks like she might have been of the latchkey generation herself. She should get this
I’m renting a house that has it’s own private trail to the beach.
No one should have this much money to argue over, but the point of child support is to ensure that the kids have similar resources and lifestyle no matter which parent they are with. The baseline doesn’t start with their bare minimum needs and work up, it starts with what they will have with the wealthier party and…
But how can you expect someone to raise 3 kids on ONLY $20 000 per month?! That’s enough for like, one banana.
Just buy her a boat. Her kids will literally live on the ocean.
Wouldn’t the prenup only reference how much money SHE is owed directly. It wouldn’t have anything to do with child support ... mostly because at the time you are signing a prenup, kids don’t exist, you wouldn’t know how many of them, what their ages were going to be, etc ,etc ,etc
Is she wrong? She has every right to expect a continuation of the luxurious lifestyle marrying Kevin Costner could afford for her and their children. I thought transactional “Love” was feminine empowerment?