Drescher is as socoiopathic as the typical corporation, but less constrained rational risk-assessment or fear of lawsuits. Good riddance.

What, exactly, is wrong with being anti-Islamic? There are other ideologies we unabashedly hate. Like libertarianism. But honestly, libertarianism has caused far less harm than Islam.

is this a monogram canvas purse? b/c that is not really an accessory i associate disproportionately w/rich ppl. and separately, spending $3k on one bag, once, is different from spending $3k on each of multiple skirts/dresses each season.

ok, but:

because: (1) being attractive is hard work — for most women, prohibitively hard; and (2) once you've pursued this career, your ability to pursue another becomes limited

I don't understand your penguin reference. Is this a PeNgUiN-oF-d00m thing?

I think you're agreeing, more or less, with my original post, but I do disagree with something you say above:

The internet is a real place that exists in the real world, but not all social contexts are identical. If you make the "okay" sign with your thumb and forefinger, the meaning is very different in some countries than others. If you shout at your little brother during a fight,"omg I'm gonna kill you," chances are…

Yeah, except to take it a step further the confederates would be keeping slaves literally for sport.

pardon?

Trophy hunting and child abuse are comparable in the sense that both trigger valid moral and ethical objections based on empathy/sadism/etc. And illegality is a meaningless, red-herring technicality, because there are plenty of jurisdictions where activities outlawed as child abuse in the USA are perfectly legal.…

I see nothing in the rhino pic demonstrating that the rhino (in contrast to the leopard) was darted, but nor did I really do any investigating, so I'll take your word for it. The Lindsey article was informative, so ty for citing. It does not dampen, whatsoever, my contempt for these people, but cest la vie.

"Death threats," and pizzas, are just how internet mobs express displeasure. To imply there is any actual risk of death would be is disingenuous.

So basically, the pictures headlining the facebook page (the ones the small-minded simpletons are upset about) *do* depict killing-for-sport.

I own an iphone, and I know abused children in China made it. If, for sport and stress relief, my fav thing to do is travel to China and enslave/abuse fresh batches of kids to craft new phones for me, have I exhibited a level of depravity different from the average iphone consumer? Why or why not?

So the bloody leopard they're letting the child heft and hold has been sedated and tagged, not shot dead?

leopard is attacking you, and transformative-justice strategies have already been tried

I would like to learn more. Can you give me an example of somebody respected in the field of conservation biology who supports trophy-hunting leopards and rhinos?

Except, here, they clearly didn't have a right, and your feelings to the contrary are irrelevant.

Yeah, this piece would have worked better when Tracie worked for Vice.