Exactly. There will always be something that does it cheaper and faster for less money...but that doesn’t mean that it’s better, or worse. Just different. I doubt Mustang GT buyers will cross-shop the Lexus LC, and vice versa.

The other two vehicles don’t have much in common other than engine size, rough body size and the driven wheels. The two cars are aimed at different people who want very different things in their cars.

35k for a mustang GT that’s over 2 seconds slower in the 1/4 mile than an 8k Yamaha FZ09?

So, you take a SMG car that (according to you) is around $4K to $5K less than a comparable manual, spend at least $3K in parts and labor to modify it to match the manual model. Add in all the time and personal energy you put into this project, even without you doing the labor. Add the stress of now driving around in a…

You’re right, I’ve never driven the new GT or NSX.. My keyboard critic analysis comes from the numbers and appearance. I think it’s overhyped and trying to be something the original NSX wasn’t. Leaving the successful recipe behind they’re going up against some strong competition. I’m sure it would give me butterflies…

Oh really? What driving impressions about the new NSX, GT and LaFerrari stuck out to you then during your drives? Not only that, but even if you somehow had the $500k+ to buy a Ford GT, you couldn’t buy one even if you wanted to.

Year 1-2-3-4-jalopnik used to have good worthy articles..

You sir, are an idiot.