lksjdflksjdlkjdlsdkjflskdj
Cabbage Patch Mather
lksjdflksjdlkjdlsdkjflskdj

I don’t believe he’s asking for your forgiveness, but for $100,000 a year, I’m sure he’d make a ‘genuine’ apology if that’s what you’re looking for.

Kind of just confirms what most of us suspected though. Spicer never believed the blatant lies he told. That stuff came directly from Herr Trump who demanded the White House press office lie to the American people.

It’s also not a “private life” thing either, because bigots don’t just stop being bigoted once they clock in at work.

I agree with her statements too but from a business perspective, it isn’t about right or wrong. Her views, just like this lady’s, will cost them money and viewers when ESPN is already losing both. 

I get this though I wish people condemning ESPN around here lately for not strongly defending Jemele Hill for making statements that likely will cost them viewers would realize that consequences for your statements can fall on liberals and conservatives alike.

The main problem with the argument if “freedom to express their opinions” is these are people in positions of power.. and those opinions show an OBVIOUS bias when there is should be none which can (and historically HAS and still DOES) lead to corruption.

Um, sure. I’m the troll.

And Arizona the state does not equal Arizona State University. Thanks though.

In it she writes quote…”I am one of the girls in the picture at the Robertsdale High school pep rally. I had the sign that said “Put the “panic” back in Hispanic”. Sir I would like to inform you that, that wasn’t my intention and was not meat for it to be taken that way. We played the Spanish Fort Toros on Friday

The issue isn’t whether the US benefitted from slavery. It’s whether slavery was the most beneficial option. Slaves have no incentive whatsoever to work. Slave owners have an incentive to maintain their property - i.e. feed and house their slaves - lest they lose their investment when a slave dies. So, what few

Jesus Christ, I do not think, or at least I hope, this is not normal. If a guy tells you about another woman being a bitch for not giving him a blow job, and you do not immediately run, not walk, from that situation, you need therapy. Really, any mention by a guy, on a first date, of other women and blow jobs should

It most definitely be rape according to many of the idiots commenting here.

The last forty years has been all about girl power ladies! You won! You’re equal in this society and country, be all you can be!

You’re confused because we are not talking about coercion.

Mind reading shouldn’t be a requirement in sexual relations. If she is not interested then why can’t she simply say so? People react differently to situations. Some women are loud screamers and moaners, others barely make a sound. Some women will climb on top and ride you hard and put you up wet. Others will

I am wary of lowering the standard to which we hold rape as a crime to the level of collegiate morality boards, largely because collegiate morality boards have an absolutely horrifying track record.

It seems that some women struggle to maintain boundaries that they set themselves. That is a personal thing that each woman much handle. As an adult if you set your boundaries and someone violates that, you firmly state that they have done so and you have the option to not be around that person any longer.

She decided to have sex even though she didn’t want to. She also does not imply that her date was aware that she was not really interested. I don’t think think the guy she met in New York did anything wrong.

“Even though I felt zero desire for him, it ultimately seemed less taxing to get drunk and let him have his way with me later that night.