Where did he say that?

That list could use ULA’s Atlas V. 54 launches with only 1 partial failure.

Your first link doesn’t say that traditional contractors would cost 1.3-3.5B more. Rather, it says that the savings came from taking a hands-off approach vs. having NASA heavily involved with the development process.

The actual major problem was that once they got in the car, the electronics limited the car to 2 minutes of driving before shutting down. Don’t know why that was left out.

Sarcasm?

Doors you could open in a garage?

No, Tesla's not banned. Why would they be?

It was a bi-partisan effort, chief. Both sides wanted the bill signed.

Because Snyder didn't want to commit political suicide to allow Tesla to sell 100 vehicles a year in the state?

What does this have to do with GM? They would probably prefer to be able to sell direct as well

It's a "vision of the future" because it's the first vehicle to use mass-produced carbon fiber, something that most car manufacturers would like to be able to do in order to reduce weight. That's why it is a game-changer. I'm failing to see how Tesla has made an impact on other manufacturers short of the dealerships…

Did you read the article? He's filing a deriviative lawsuit so any proceeds would go back into the company. The only way he could make money would be by shorting Tesla.

SO EDGY

Unless each car had over 1000 unique passengers, the probability of dying from the ignition switch issue is still higher

There were 1.6 million vehicles with the faulty ignition switch. There are 7+ billion people who could get killed by lightning. So no, it's not several times more likely to die from lightning.

Gull-wing doors have been around since the 50's