If we all agree that it was a not funny offensive joke, doesn’t that just make it offensive? Seriously, I think people are more insulted at the lack of effort than anything else. A joke like that without a hilarious punchline is just an excuse to say something you otherwise would not feel free to say.

Bullshit. People understand satire, there is a world a difference between Blazing Saddles a lazy, unfunny, offensive joke. People love offensive humor, what they hate is when you’re too fucking lazy to make a funny offensive joke.

Why does how old the video is matter?

Thats how I feel about Nick Searcy

Did you not say I was lecturing you on a subject you know more about? I assume you’re talking about comedy.

So now YOU’RE the arbiter of humor? lol! C’mon dude...

You are vastly overestimating his popularity. Im ure plenty of people will follow him no matter where he goes but it wont hurt youtube not to have him.

I have not made anything up, just calling it like I see it.

Pretty sure Felix helped those implications along with “Death to Jews” etc

Lol, what? I think you’re very into stand up comedy and also being wilfully obtuse.

Lol, its incredible.

OK, so you just illogically and blindly hate the government. Why not lead with that and spare everyone the effort?

You’re talking to an ideologue. The politics surrounding healthcare and his personal situation matter more than the facts.

Im not making excuses, Im calling your bullshit out. If you want me to understand something, make an argument and support it with evidence to make me understand it. A few articles from conservative think tanks doesn’t prove anything to me. Im not making the argument that the ACA is perfect, I think necessary until we…

Oh this is a common tactic. Heres 7 articles mostly from conservative thinktanks that say a bunch of different things with zero context. Although Im disappointed in this kind of surface level thinking, I am not surprised by it. I am wondering if you understand how health insurance works on a basic level. The business…

No my friend, I am trying to understand your argument that you refuse to support. If I have to ask you a bunch of questions to get to the root of your argument, then so be it, we will use the Socratic method.

Ofcourse it has a place, but by definition its going to be a fringe audience.

What is libelous in the piece?

You’re the one who made a big deal about facts, I am only pointing out that you havent shared a single fact with us?! Why hide your facts, friend?

Ugh, that guy. Anyway, apologies, misunderstood your original comment.