lisaclews555
Tosca
lisaclews555

In my entirely unqualified opinion, sex robots of an actual human being who has not consented to have a sex robot made of her/him are unethical, creepy, and really borderline a violation, but sex robots not made in the likeness of a specific human being or made with a person’s permission are not unethical. Creepy to

It’s delightful. He sent out a request to a company asking to buy fetal tissue from them, in what he clearly thought would be a sting.

It’s something so repulsive even I won’t eat it, and I’ve been known to put away half a can of vanilla frosting for lunch. A key word that everyone seems to be leaving out is STICKY.

An ingredient in the (semi-)official Massachusetts state sandwich:

My home town has really awful medical services and a truly terrible city hospital staffed by the kind of doctors who will drop you if you question them. So it’s no great surprise that many of my friends who live there are huge fans of alternative medicine. One drives an hour to her homeopathic dentist (who has already

I just donated to UNICEF. Here’s the link if anyone else would like to.

The statement that women aren’t interested in uneducated or antisocial types is the annoying part. I could care less if he is personally inspired by women writers, but his justification is completely ridiculous and shows that he obviously hasn’t paid enough attention to women writers to be uninspired by them. He’s

Calmly saying something non-factual and ahistoric does not lend truthiness to a self-serving lie; it just makes the speaker look especially ignorant, because apparently that ignorance is willful rather than emotional (men get emotional when it comes to women and their inferiority, I’ve found). No one is complaining

If he’s so irrelevant and doddering universities shouldn’t be inviting him to speak, USC shouldn’t continue to have him as faculty for their masters professional writing program, and he shouldn’t have three projects under contract at present.

In the mid 80s a college professor told me a (possibly apocryphal) story about a male student who wrote an essay arguing that women were inherently less rigorous writers- using George Eliot’s work as an example of the epitome of said rigorous male writing that no woman could match.

Where in this piece did the author say Talese should be dis-credited for his early work? In fact she does the opposite, she gives him his due. Does this make him above criticism.

Both influential and irrelevant. Damn, son, do you need a chiropractor for that twisting you did?

Pouring one out for the pitiful old rich white guy still spouting misogyny.

He's so irrelevant he was asked to speak at an industry event. Nice argument there

Thanks!

*farts*

I’m getting married in July and I got scolded because:

I wanted to rule the world, as it’s malevolent Empress, which I imagined meant getting to wear a bitching outfit like all the Disney villians. It’s still my dream, if I’m being perfectly honest.

Well, there’s two clear solutions to that: