In fairness, if that really were the case, for what possible reason could it be so difficult to find a movie where two women have a conversation about something other than a man?

In fairness, his death didn’t exactly resolve his hypocrisy.

If only that were the only timely frame with which to view all this! Given the pileup of political operatives cashing-in, rather than informing the electorate in a timely fashion (to the point it’s even a T-Shirt), I think it’s more than reasonable to lump her in, despite that particular revelation (in a book…

Although high-lighting not just the hypocrisy but the racism was the point.

I can’t imagine they won’t just move on to reporting whatever social media outlet has the most effective enragement engagement engine or most beneficial bribery marketing scheme at that point

“Even more galling: Just five days ago, sources told People, [...]” How dare she be associated with someone who, perhaps without her knowledge or consent, said something that doesn’t seem to be born out by later events?!?

Come on now! Can you imagine the conniption the GQP would have over the possibility of a First Lady who was not only foreign-born, but a green card recipient before being granted citizenship?

Which is why she already effectively did this with her various masks... It was Senate Dems fault for doing something they hadn’t yet done!

It’s worth noting that this story shows the importance of down-ballot races and “off-year” elections.

I think this “in-depth” analysis suffers for postulating facts as the only type of truth

I thought the header picture of this post proved that motivation, but that vest is likely from his 2018 Senate run (that ended in the primary), he’s running for another term as AG in 2024.

In fairness, we all sorta thought it’d be children

“Is it adultery when the divorce is already taking place?” Biblical Jesus literally says the answer would be “Yes”, which perhaps should matter to the people trying to implement Christofascism, or the like.

I believe this is a group discussion assignment and that direction is about that, rather than that being an in-scenario requirement

“Dems only have 1 (actually fucking govern the country as they were elected to do)“ I don’t believe that’s exactly a victory condition for the Dems, as their tent contains differing philosophies on various issues, so even if they only compromise amongst themselves, their base is unlikely to be truly happy

Makes you wonder what we’d be seeing if C-SPAN was allowed independent cameras in the rules package.

Good point! What could be more ridiculous than considering that either you or someone reading your suggestion could possibly not know a less publicized point about a type of contraception, in a country that has such peerless sexual health education?!?

Here’s a handy primer detailing the relevant statutes for Colorado [1]. You might note Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25-14-203(2) (2023) defines “auditorium” and Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25-14-203(4.5) (2023) defines “Electronic smoking device” or “ESD”.

In fairness, that would make it the pro-choice crowd’s fault.

By “the last few pills left in a pack”, I hope you don’t mean the placebo pills, which would be completely unsuited for that purpose.