Its the Ferrari Catch-22.

Are we still using this? I feel like we’ve moved on to something danker.

“Uber, of course, is determined to fight the case, arguing that it’s wrong to be weighed down by a 1992 law with no conception of mobile apps.”

Your position applies only to rounds fired vertically enough to have lost all momentum to drag before the earth, or something else, gets in the way. Mostly right though, it’s just the terminal velocity part.

I’m fairly sure that was a .45acp with a subsonic load, it’s only producing 850-900fps at the muzzle anyways and…

Man, I get nervous if I have passengers, especially if they have food or drinks. No eating. Drinks need lids, or to stay in their cans. I mean, I go full Captain Buzzkill with that.

I guess some people just want a TT-RS. You have it good in the US, but in Europe there’s not much you can buy for that money.

Seems kinda rude.

Yield is something that people don’t see enough to understand in the US. At some point it was decided to take all responsibility from the drivers’ judgement and throw stop signs everywhere. The same kind of lowest common denominator thinking that gave us a 55 mph speed limit.

Signal right (or left, in a country that drives on the left) when you are coming up on your exit.

!!!!!!!Yield to traffic already in the roundabout!!!!!!

Please, please, signal when you are about to exit. Otherwise people about to enter don’t know that you’re exiting and are forced to stop and wait, defeating the entire purpose of a roundabout.

It’s a perfect idea for passenger cars. It’s far more efficient than gasoline, in many cases being very close to/above hybrid efficiency.

Because they’re generally uncompetitive in this market. Too clearly designed with a different market in mind. Design, interior, engines, body shapes (sedans?), size, they all tend to be different from what people here generally desire. Let’s turn it around: how many French cars do you see driving around in the US?…

Because the ST is based off of an economy car platform. The BRZ includes the cost of designing an entirely new platform from the ground up specifically for one low-volume model.

Just to be clear, I’m not defending them. I just think the names are exactly as stupid as all the comment rage regarding the stupid names, which have been wrong for far longer than the 3/4 split (ever since the trim number stoppred reflecting engine size)

Because unlike Fox, Breitbart etc, the BBC is a legit news organization that cares about getting the facts right before posting assumption and speculation.

What exactly is the hurry on that? Maybe it’s better to gather facts THEN decide what happened. Just an idea.

Because until they know something more concrete than, “A bunch of people were attacked”, they aren’t going to go off half-cocked like your average Internet comment board devotee.

Yeah, and that’s why no one in Europe has a large family or attends soccer football practice.

I’m 6'2" as well and I can’t say legroom in a front seat has ever been a problem for me. Not even in the tiniest of tiny cars, like a 1970 Fiat 500. Rear legroom, sure. Shoulderroom, granted. Front headroom, yes. But front legroom? Nope.