lilyreeds
lilyreeds
lilyreeds

I am really sick of seeing sex framed as an object that one can give or receive rather than an experience. It's one of the fundamentally erroneous assumptions in so much discourse on this issue.

But they have veggie wraps now! A whole two of them! Still no vegan options, though, not even the fries.

Please see my response above.

Yes and they target drunk girls because they can get away with it when the girl is drunk. They know society will have "their back" and blame the girl for getting drunk. If girls stop drinking then it will be about what she's wearing (which is what people used to focused on more in the past and in other

Yes, and the punishment for a lack of prudence should be a $20 fine collected by legitimate authorities, not the slight chance of a violent assault by a sexually maladjusted vigilante.

I don't think anyone wants "consequence-free" drinking- you're still liable for anything you do while you're drunk, which is why "but I'm drunk!" doesn't work particularly well as an excuse for drunk driving. But being raped is not something that you caused to happen by drinking- you were raped because a rapist chose

Women basically have an extremely limited 'right' to self defense. People just don't think about it. Sexism against women is justified by the belief that women are unreasonable in all different kinds of ways, and that men own women, so men get to control them——-because women aren't real independent people, you know?

As someone who nearly got raped after consuming alcohol, let me just say—it's all well and good until it happens to you and then you realize how stupid it is to blame alcohol on rape and not rapists who use alcohol to rape.

Don't get me started on child custody or child support payments. They want very strict gender roles (i.e. women stay home to take care of children) and then scream murder when the courts award custody to the mother and the financial support that comes with it. If you dare to point out that you can't have it both

And what about the men who were "buying" these women? Raping them for money? Anyone going to investigate that? Not likely.

They don't think it's rape. Its not that they think they were asking for rape, they think women are stupid and half way through fucking someone we realize we can be called a whore, so we claim it's rape so we can fuck freely and not be a slutty slut. Get out of whore free card, if you will.

Do you understand what it's like to be raped? The only obligation a victim has is to healing themselves. Even in ideal circumstances it can be traumatizing, let alone when one is homeless. For some victims it has truly ruined their lives. And as a D.A. you should know that juries are very unlikely to convict when the

"Too much hate..."

The irony!

Barring medical necessity, I say they can't be trusted.

Yup. And he ends with what we all know his point was to begin with, although he argued over and over that he wasn't attempting to introduce morality...

SCIENCE!

If a man doesn't want to have unprotected sex, he can say no as well. They both allow it to happen, it's mutual.

What? that has nothing to do with anything you've been saying. Your entire point has been about how they burden is on women to never have sex unless they want to become pregnant. You have said that repeatedly.

It's those guys' deer-in-headlights responses to soundly-constructed hypotheses like yours which reinforce my ever-increasing suspicion that "Men Are Rational and Logical" is the biggest combination propaganda campaign and long con of our time.

I know, Rev. Conway has said that many times.