I dropped Judge John Hodgman a few years ago after noticing how often he mocked people for renting or not having kids. It made my Robespierre muscles twitch.
I dropped Judge John Hodgman a few years ago after noticing how often he mocked people for renting or not having kids. It made my Robespierre muscles twitch.
Seriously, he's a dumb, petty, rage-fueled elderly toddler. Completely uncomplicated.
Many high-end theaters have a catheterization service now, which I always take advantage of.
It's spelled "Hëgël," I believe.
Me too, but I stand with antifa furs against Nazi furs.
If your name rhymes with "shitter" you need to be extra careful not to reveal your poopy diaper to the public.
Oh jesus, that Lyft story was amazing. Just imagining Adam meekly arguing "no, I mean I know them personally, they're nice," and getting berated for it, without her even knowing that he's in fucking Cum Town. She probably would have murdered him.
Or the similar Teen Pope segment with Brian Huskey.
No.
Nobody's saying he's perfect, just that he's better than most of the rest. He should be the baseline of what we expect from a politician.
The most unrealistic thing about that episode was that they didn't immediately start fucking when they saw each other.
Yes and no, anarchism fits under the wide umbrella of socialism (anarchocapitalism isn't anarchism, it's just libertarianism for even bigger nerds). It is pretty annoying that they're mischaracterizing the beliefs of the actual people involved.
I heard scenes like that involving Commander Riker had to be cut from over 30 different Next Generation episodes.
He's admitted it: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/…
Maybe it really did happen, I'm just saying that his record of dishonesty and histrionics makes this even more difficult to believe.
People who don't want to look at child porn tend to avoid looking at it.
"Well, my husband is having a seizure. Should I call 911 and help him out, or should I log onto his account and post a rejoinder to an anonymous Twitter user?"
The guy that sent him the gif is undoubtedly a piece of shit. But I just can't believe anything that Eichenwald says. The Outline article has plenty of sources, so anybody who doesn't like that site for whatever reason can click on those, most of which go to more high-profile, mainstream sites. He lies, and…
Why does it matter which one of us sends you the links? And honestly, why do you care so much about some washed-up, disgraced journalist?
The Outline isn't bullshit, it's just new, small, and probably to the left of you. They have great stuff. It's the only article that has a thorough, concise description of Eichenwald's journalistic and ethical problems. That NYMag article I linked you is much, much longer, though it's a good article too.