That's some harsh accusations. To be fair, I would not be so surprised knowing what kind of article Max Read produce. Got any example? That sounds like the kind of thing that should be heard.

How did "I have never seen it" become synonym of "It doesn't exist"?

I guess we don't read the same stuff.

I agree... Even if both are somewhat the same company, Kotaku managed to keep the most inflammatory article off its pages.

I'm not the original author of this term... So I can plead guilty to plagiarism.

Some tried, but it will never work if there is not any kind of media coverage. To be clear, I'm not associated with GG, just giving my point of view on it.

Never said I was like that. I was just making a cool-headed analyze of the situation, so please keep this discussion civilized.

People got short memory, what can I say.

Let express my point of view about Fish... It's not that he showed solidarity, it's how he did it. That and and telling people to go kill themselves, or being one massive douche after getting an award. It's as if he tried very hard to be hated as much as possible. For that, I guess he succeed beyond expectation.

I think my point - if badly expressed - is not about the media reporting it, but how they reported it. If you read a newspaper, they will go;

Do you know why? Because it's easier. It's a single individual with a name. To be fair, Phil Fish got as much shit as Zoe. So claiming it's all about gender is not rock solid too.

To be fair, over-generalization is a pitfall pretty easy to get trapped into. "All Democrats" or "All Republicans" is something that should not be used. "X individual did something bad." Of course, how the representative of said group react to this is what makes of break it for the whole group. Since GG lack any kind…

Yes, I worked on Brotherhood, Revelation and 3. But it's alright, everybody got a different perspective on things. So someone in the same studio as me would most likely have a different point of view on all those events.

Because with 750 people working on that game - and me busy making it - I obviously had my word to say on how the marketing would do their job. :p

No, no... A kitten is cute.

I did, and did not agree with it. To me, it was overly aggressive, and was made for the "wow factor". Hell, even someone on Kotaku made a post about "Oh, wait, when he says gamers, he doesn't mean gamers... he means bad people, who claim to be gamer, you know..." Was a rather confusing moment.

Well, what would you do except asking for more ethic?

I think I've read someone claiming it was all fake. *shrug*

and love guns!

And we all know that the way it started dictate how it will always be.