At my wife’s library, they had a recent kidnapping of a toddler. Fortunately, they nabbed the guy an hour later. The positive side effect is that parents are less likely to drop their kids off at the library as free daycare now.

He’ll probably want to do something that puts him in prison. (Enter your own democratic voter joke here - Not sure why I put that there or why the opposite was in the article. Guess it’s just a Gawker staple.)

I was a page at the library, and after storytime was the absolute WORST. The parents would be socializing with each other while their toddlers screamed and played tag. I preferred unsupervised, after-school teenagers to those little monsters.

My Mom was a nurse in the 60’s who worked in pediatrics for a while. She got this one kid as a patient whose father was a psychiatrist. Whenever the nurses told the kid to do anything, the kid would say “Don’t force me. You’ll upset me.”

I’m old enough to remember when the phrase “children having children” referred strictly to teenage pregnancies. Seems these days it could apply to 30-year-old first-wave Millennials.

I liked this movie better when it was an episode of Futurama.

Sandler plays Brenner, a former arcade superstar back in the mid-’80s whose life, predictably, has become a failure

That’s cute, attributing #1 to a political party that wouldn’t be founded until 1854...

Except, the Republican party didn’t exist in 1812.

There were no republicans at that time. The party did not exist until shortly before the Civil war when they were created to end Slavery.

Keep in mind that Republican is short for Democratic-Republican... generally considered the forerunner of the modern Democratic party. The GOP as we know it did not exist prior to the 1850s.

The real question is this—how will he be brought back to life, and will he be the same Jon when he comes back?

yo can we talk about how funny kit was on Seven Days in Hell

1) Where’s the strawman? Are you arguing black lives only matter when they’re taken by a white police officer?

Greg, can you provide more than ad hominem when decrying this statement? Thx

I’m not a fan of SAS at all, but I don’t see the problem with the tweet. Please enlighten me.

It’s better than “Las Vegas Ragged Showgirl Who Looks About 55 Giving A Handjob In The Tropicana Parking Lots”....

Tough to claim you’re on the right side of history when you just outed and gay-shamed a man and his family for no reason at all.

“Hackers Threaten to Expose 40 Million Cheating AshleyMadison Users”

Great point, didn't think about it like that. I guess I was confused since Deadspin REPOSTED the article to their blog as well. But tell me more about apples and oranges please.