My main issue with this layout is how much of a pain it is cycling through comments.

I've found that a lot of people feel the need to announce what they are or expect some kind of special treatment/attention.

The ending was kinda meh but Psycho Pass, Shinsekai Yori and Zetsuen no Tempest at least made up for the very lackluster Winter anime season.

Yea I misread that as several hundred years earlier.

Sounds like it'd then have a lot more fantasy elements than the current one already does since that was when magic and dragons were at full power. Be pretty interesting to see.

I think it's for some of the things here: http://consumerist.com/tag/google/

So it lets you make the city actually be the size of a city and not a tiny little square? Neat.

In the end Blizzards motto is gameplay first so they put a lot of the extra details into other media.

I first read that as 'unicorn baby' and then noticed my error and was far less interested.

I wanted to hit undo anytime it put down roads wrong.

Well GW2 just locked realms and why Tera didn't have issues is pretty easy to figure out.

Well obviously you think your opinion should be universal.

Games alright but I much prefer Cities XL's bigger maps.

I liked Crysis 3 but you can't please everyone.

A better comparison would be like saying (for this examples sake) that the guy in Gears of War looks like the guy in Mass Effect. Your example would only work if Blizzard was behind DOTA 2 and not Valve.

Oh I know and I've mentioned that enough in the past as well. It's just always China rip-off level amusing regardless.

Would be better if I couldn't tell you what WC3 unit each one of those is based on.

I wouldn't look too into how Kotaku 'scores' a game.

If that was it that city would have been obliterated.

When I saw commercials for the game before it was out I couldn't help but always think to myself 'that game looks like it was made in the 90's'. Needless to say I'm not surprised it was bad.