leviathonlx
Justin Jackson
leviathonlx

Well yea I understand we mate less as each country becomes a industrialized nation and it places like the US we only really see the poor or other niche groups reproduce quite a bit. My concern is usually just in general when I see how many humans there are on this planet.

Well it's like I said to another reply. I am not really looking at humans when I am talking about overpopulation and am looking at the animals we continue pushing into extinction or critical population levels as we take more and more space and/or destroy their environments. If we were to bring about our own demise by

Thing is that the moment something occurs that effects our mass production you'll then see the side effects of that (IE: the drought this past summer). Food-wise we are ok for now as long as the production doesn't get affected but we are already getting close to the point of where we are using more water than is

In 1st world countries? No. In countries like China and India? You betcha they do. Course my perfect scenario would be a worldwide negative population growth for at least a couple generations since there's no reason whatsoever to have 7 billion humans on this planet. I really think that we could get close to a utopia

I fear for the day we manage to make ourselves immortal or live longer than we already do unless we also take into consideration that we need to reproduce less with those longer lives. I doubt the human races ability to suppress that instinct to reproduce so hopefully it'd never happen until the day we can colonize

Been the opposite in my family. Younger siblings got everything while I'm kinda just brushed to the side.

The moment I saw the first commercial for this movie I kinda laughed. Just the implausible idea of North Korea being able to take over this country is pretty laughable. At least if it was something like China or even Russia like the original it may be a little less laugh worthy.

The Union was a scapegoat for a already failing company.

It's not like it's a rule that you need to kill people.

I think his logic was that you can't rely on people to do what he did.

Since that's not what the maps for.

It's as they say, different strokes for different folks. For me I enjoy the challenge and building up my character through hard work. The only other 'MMO' type game I enjoy is GW2 but the lack of any PvE type end-game is the reason why it's a side game I play while playing a MMO like WoW and lament how much I'd love

I find it hard to list other MMO's with a raiding end-game that don't suck.

The overall gist of the questions made me think the entire things purpose is to get lopsided results to paint gaming as bad.

And in a few months we'll be reading about how a judge tossed the case.

Kinda feels like I can apply most those questions to just about anything in life. Seems the goal of the thing is to just paint games as bad considering my answer choices.

Most likely Blizzard as Blizzard isn't as controlled by Activision as haters want to think.

I was tempted to buy it but then I noticed I needed to buy the OS then buy an addon to the OS to get all the features that came with every previous version of Windows.