letskeepitreal753
LetsKeepItReal753
letskeepitreal753

Welp, you just spilled those beans...

NOOOOOOO! What!?

This sounds super creepy, but I’m going to look at ‘that’ gif now...You know the one...

Like, “political” Jack Valenti? That must be an interesting story...Was he hoarding screeners at the time, or was it your difficult duty to go to his home and collect them (I don’t envy you that task.)

I think the concern of some of us on the thread is that the WW narrative treats larger women as a monolith...Every women and her body image is different and this “campaign” feels like “hey some of you who felt okay having sex at any size, did you know you’re actually supposed to feel badly about yourself? See, our

Seems like because they can’t cajole or guilt more people into joining, they’ve decided on some weird semi-gaslighting/concern trolling campaign.

All it takes is that single shred...

In October of 2000 I sat in a room full of housing rights and AIDS Research activists and laughed about the prospects of Bush being “elected.”

And Chili’s:

Do not tempt fate...Please go outside, turn around 3 times and spit!

+ 1 for the 90's reference I forgot about

If someone came to me with “usually, people of African-American descent” re: anything, I’d feel weird and bit offended.

I love Heather the same way I love Lisa Vanderpump Todd: They’re wealthy, over the top, and live in an opulent bubble of fabulousness. I’d trade my daily work shenanigans for being paid to get kicked out of luxury stores any day!

Great point!

Thanks for the response; I think I’ve hit my limit with stories like this. I think I’m hoping for a perfect outcome, which does not exist.

I agree re: they should decide to do what’s best for them. But in my time as a victim advocate for young people of color abused by former members of a powerful entity, I saw first hand that MANY perpetrators welcome closed depositions and quick/no contest settlements to assuage themselves of wrong doing. To think this

I don’t recall insinuating you were alluding to altruism, I meant that the Archdiocese has earned no good will in this matter and does not deserve the benefit of the doubt in any instance in these matter.

I know this, but I will not give the Archdiocese the benefit of the doubt on anything.

I get what you’re saying, but this settlement structure is under the guise of expediting the process for victims who may need the money (for PTSD and trauma treatment, life-long STD’s acquired from abusing priests, etc.) when it’s just a ploy to make sure victims’ stories never see the light of day. I feel like I’m

Their time? Dignity? Sense of trust in authority?