So if me and Cindymoo break up (heaven forbid), that means I can sue her for spousal support for Figaro, Floyd, and our future bunnies and potential sloths and capybara? Good to know!

I don’t know about that. You see a lot of prudeness, close-mindedness, and fear when certain progressives talk about video games, for example.

Scalia is a flaming turd, obviously.

PAY. FOR. YOUR. MUSIC.

Ted Kennedy was on the no fly list. It's clearly flawed.

Wouldn’t restricting one set of American citizens (those of on the no-fly list) still be considered unconstitutional? I mean, that’s their - the gun lobby - argument right there. It’s not like they can go: our guns are our guns. Except for those dudes.

It’s really surprising just how onboard everybody on Gawker is with restricting civil rights without any form of due process.

The no fly list is a secret, no visibility into who’s on it or why. Seems like a real bad plan to restrict firearm purchases based on a secret government list.

Why don’t you go try to confiscate them and see what happens? Let us know how that works out.

Ugh....please, please, don’t start.

Yeah, this is a fairly silly way to investigate. Clean energy is good, but if fossil fuels don’t cause global warming, the deleterious effects of fossil fuels only cause substantial harm to the few who work in and around the extraction process. The remainder of the population sees huge benefits via cheap reliable fuel…

“Even if climate change wasn’t a thing at all, how can you see cleaner energy as a bad thing?”

can you really not distinguish between someone acting on behalf of an organization composed of tens of thousands of people with an express mission and one mentally unstable individual shooting up a bunch of people?

Exactly.

It’s no wonder people have to warp the facts when they have a neat little narrative that they’re trying to fit them into.

No shit, Professor Einstein.

women are coming forward but are any of them pressing charges?

I think you are missing the point - unless you are assuming that every accusation he has faced has been legitimate. One would assume, I think, that Hillary would be dismissive of claims against her husband which would undermine her assertion that accusers be heard and believed.

An entirely fair, and necessary, question.

Can you tell us more thingz without the brain hurty numbers and words? Please I need to know if I can conserve my outrage tonight.