Oh my God, he totally looks the way I'd expect. I love the non-threatening/sensitive expression on his face. No wonder he's not interested in older women, I'm sure they see through his bullshit.

Yep, it's a neck. Amazing find there.

Most people at the beach are less clothed than a 42 year old lady in a summer dress, too!

Oh, thank God I've got a gym membership! I only keep it so that Tom Junod will do me the great honor of being willing to put his penis inside me, despite my being the advanced, nay, decrepit age of fifteen years younger than him.

tl:dr

"There is simply no one as unclothed as a forty-two-year-old woman in a summer dress"

I would argue that straight-up naked people are more unclothed than a 42-year-old woman in a summer dress.

::imagines a dude attempting to type by flopping his dick around::

He's a sweetheart. And people say "nice guys" finish last. Nice Guyz (TM) finish last. Actual nice men finish first as far as I'm concerned.

And yet, somehow I don't think that Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Garner, Mya Rudolph, Christina Applegate, Sofia Vagara, et. all are clamoring to find 56 year old Tom Junod all that fuckable.

IF

It would be amazing if actresses stopped granting interviews with these men's magazines. End of story.

LOL! 42 is fine but at 43 you're unfuckable again?

The article is about how a dangerous new genre of porn is threatening the health and safety of porn actresses. It is not advocating this act or saying it is a good thing, rather the exact opposite. Nor does he mock people who engage in it. He is pointing to the porn industry for this problem, defending porn actors.…

Since you seem to be in trouble, I'll try to help you. First of all, if you are gonna get sarcastic and offensive in a post (on the internet), you better make sure that you are reacting to the right person, and about an appropriate subject. It is not adequate to (attempt to) berate a writer for quoting someone else.…

This is something I've felt strongly about for a long time, ever since I had the first logic-devoid argument with a guy about how they had zero problems using women for sex but wouldn't date these same women because they were "easy."

That would make sense if my pussy were made up of many little rods that have to be turned in a precise manner as to gain entry somewhere. Otherwise I don't really get it.

I totally agree with you, but I've seen comments on Jezebel from misogynists (trolls?) who use this argument: "a key that opens many locks is a very good key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a worthless lock."

This is what I don't get — women are impure because males have touched them. Who's the dirty one here? And guys, don't you get annoyed at being a metaphor for ruining another person's worth? How can that feel good to hear?