Didn't know Honey Badgers could use tools. We should add them to the Uplift Candidate List.

Being the number one person I loved to hate, I have to say it was somewhat disheartening to see him get killed...somewhat. The only thing tempering the 'love to hate' loss was Cersei stepping up her 'love to hate' game one again. She had been slipping. Together, they made for such a wonderful/hateful, want to see…

This needs to be a shirt.

Also, this:

Since you seem to be in trouble, I'll try to help you. First of all, if you are gonna get sarcastic and offensive in a post (on the internet), you better make sure that you are reacting to the right person, and about an appropriate subject. It is not adequate to (attempt to) berate a writer for quoting someone else.…

Hey Brochacho... let's have a strategy meeting: if you're going to criticize the things written in this article, you should criticize the things written in this article, instead of the things written in another article that this author of this article was quoting in this article... you know... because she was…

Wow. I've been a longtime reader of Gawker/Jezebel/i09 and have never been compelled to comment until I read this thread.

"This childish, clearly spurned mentality, should not exist in professional journalism."

1) This childish, clearly spurned mentality of yours, should not exist in a decent grown man, especially one professing sincerity and who is old enough to read better.

2) Commenters who invoke the practices/canons/ethics of…

No, quotation marks mean that I DIDN'T WRITE IT. Go yell at the guy who did, dingdong.

Uh, no, it wasn't an "ad hominem attack" (waaaaahhhhhh!!!!!), it was a sincere recommendation. If you were better at reading you'd notice that "the mindset of men in the 21st century" is in quotation marks. Which means I'm quoting someone. Someone else. Someone whose stance I'm critiquing. Which is the entire point of…

Read better.

This is something I've felt strongly about for a long time, ever since I had the first logic-devoid argument with a guy about how they had zero problems using women for sex but wouldn't date these same women because they were "easy."

That would make sense if my pussy were made up of many little rods that have to be turned in a precise manner as to gain entry somewhere. Otherwise I don't really get it.

Not trying to snark - is that a serious question? Purity rings are DEFINITELY real and DEFINITELY used.

I totally agree with you, but I've seen comments on Jezebel from misogynists (trolls?) who use this argument: "a key that opens many locks is a very good key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a worthless lock."

This is what I don't get — women are impure because males have touched them. Who's the dirty one here? And guys, don't you get annoyed at being a metaphor for ruining another person's worth? How can that feel good to hear?

I think men are taught that:

I can't even say how much I love you for referencing Pokemon in this. That is all.

Squirtle uses Hydro pump!

I actually had a weird opposite experience to a lot of this. When I was single, I was all, "I really want to be with someone who's had some life experience." What happened? Wound up with someone who (at the time) was a virgin who'd only been in one relationship. I mean, don't get me wrong - it totally worked out. …