leewhelchel01
Big Fan
leewhelchel01

Ever ride in a Mark V. It was really small inside.

For at least 6 years in the 1960s Lincoln made only one model, the 4 door Continental. Why not be bold and build one gorgeous car that everybody wants instead of 5 mediocre cars no one wants?

United. No contest. They are terrible.

Thanks. I've been very lucky in my life, able to succeed at anything I touch, not pinned down in a little corner spouting off about what an "expert" I am while simultaneously making absurd assertions such as, say, OSHA inspects restaurants for hairnets. An FYI, "expert" AVN is the industry newsletter, hardly a

Right, well if you say so. I think it's kind of funny how you keep having to throw out your credentials to back up your argument. As a polymath (I have several masters degrees and run a number of companies, including an adult film company) I don't feel the need to parade my credentials in order to bolster my

Exactly, this law contraverts the first amendment and is unconstitutional. Glad you understand now lambchop. What a pity you couldn't see it that was 5 posts ago. Forest for the trees.

Sorry dahlin' just because a regulation exists doesn't mean it's constitutional, did you sleep through constructional law?

You're confused. OSHA is responsible for worker safety , not food safety. Forbidding actors from portraying a legal act is censorship and violates their first amendment rights, just as much as forbidding smoking in movies would do.

But you are also free to exercise your first amendment rights to free speech, why are the porno actors not?

And the porn actors don't have the same rights?

Actually yes, this law is about policing pornos, It makes not using a condom in a video a crime. All that will happen is the industry will leave LA. If pornos can be policed, why not everyone all the time? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_B

Why not pass a law requiring everyone to wear condoms unless they are trying to conceive?

I'm in over my head.

Unlikely a building in that neighborhood would go into disrepair. This is about making money, not fending off decay.

Except the a Supreme Court has allowed emm

We have a tax structure that promotes his kind of wealth. We can hardly be surprised when we see this kind of spending, can we?

1960s Lincoln.