leanbean992
leanbean992
leanbean992

SHEIKHS! AYATOLLAHS! IMAMS! JAFAR FROM ALADDIN! PEDOPHILES FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD! THEY WERE ALL INTERESTED IN THIS UNDERAGE GIRL!

You know you’ve entered uncharted territory when Heidi Pratt looks like the sanest person in the room.

Nooo they were the only ones selling reasonably-priced underwire swimsuits that were targeted to mid-20s/30s crowd. Where am I gonna go now?

Mayor of a town of 40,000 doesn’t address almost any federal issue. Clinton was an active and involved First Lady who shaped a number of legislative initiatives. So yes, I think that experience is more applicable. And if you want to try to make it about feminism, I would have preferred Clinton’s first lady experience

The notion that 8 years of mayoral experience in Burlington, a town of about 40,000, is useful towards the presidency is NONSENSE. I would definitely rank national experience, even in an unelected position like First Lady or Secretary of State, as more relevant than that.

Who was in Life magazine for a liberal rebuttal of a standing Senator’s speech at their college graduation, who got a job as part of the Watergate prosecution team straight out of law school? Are you guessing Bill? You’d be wrong. Sexism has some amazing blinders available- every accomplishment Hillary Rodham had was

So the fact that she went to law school, graduated with honors, has built a career (that she put on hold to support her husband in his own ambitions)...none of that matters because she comes from money and married a man who became president? She might've had a leg up but that doesn't mean she owes her entire career to

It’s not her support of Bernie Sanders that makes me question her feminism, but the fact that she chooses to define Clinton by her relationship to her father and her husband, rather than any actual merits or her own accomplishments.

Perinatal hospice care:

I posed a theory on Facebook that perhaps, if all the Bernie fanatics showed up with such enthusiasm to local and mid-term elections, we wouldn’t need a revolution. And the overwhelming response was that “it’s all rigged, man!”

If one more Bernie bro tells me I just haven’t read the right article otherwise I’d be a convert too, I am going to scream

this is very different from the Bernie bros I know (and I know quite a few): their hallmark trait seems to be cynicism. to hear them talk Bernie would have everyone’s approval if it weren’t for the evil media not giving him the coverage he deserves. furthermore, there’s a marked air of defeat, on a personal level,

Splitter!

Where does students matter $$ come from? A direct attack on tenure of teachers instead of the distribution of the teachers and funding seem like a strange move for a group hoping to make schools better

Did you see Sam Bee’s piece on how poor women have trouble affording diapers for their kids? And how Republicans think these women shouldn’t be able to pay for diapers with food stamps? And if you can’t afford to buy diapers, you probably should have thought about that before you went and got yourself pregnant, slut?

If legislators care SO DAMN MUCH about black and brown babies, they could, you know, address the poverty, lack of educational opportunity, lack of parental leave and affordable childcare options, shitty sex ed and access to contraception and reproductive care, and myriad other factors that actually influence into

It’s seriously the most nonsensical thing. Like, finally, the one ridiculous case where conservatives are open to a disparate impact analysis.

celebs don’t have to be role models. they don’t have to be politically aware. they don’t have to be rational and intelligent.