That’s my thought. Blac Chyna has a good argument that the contract is unenforceable because it’s against publicly policy to use the contract to keep a victim of abuse from coming forward.

She mostly doesn’t reveal anything about him other than that though.

No, they are non-binding when it comes to criminal activity. Period. Not just when reporting to the police.

I read it as she signed DNR.

because if they don’t, they won’t get paid by e!.

No, NDAs can’t prevent someone from reporting crimes.

The NDA can’t possibly keep someone from pressing charges when a member of the family is in violation of the law though?

Fair enough, and I’m not arguing that it’s a good thing to sleep with a married person; I just see a lot of anger directed at the unmarried person in these situations and it makes basically no sense to me. In this case it was the “What sort of woman would do something like this to another woman?” line that had me…

Like, aside from being impossible, if the entire rest of the world collectively decided to keep someone from physically cheating who otherwise would given the opportunity, is it really any better?

You say “they have fault too” but... why? I’m genuinely asking. Man or woman, if a married partner decides they want to cheat, I really don’t see how the rest of the world has any more responsibility to their marriage than they do. Like, aside from being impossible, if the entire rest of the world collectively decided…

See, I still don’t get this. If you’re not the one who agreed to not fuck other people, why is it suddenly your responsibility to keep someone else from breaking their own agreement? She didn’t sign their marriage license. Why should she be responsible for it? Dude made a decision to cheat on his wife and that’s…

This. I have only once had sex with a man who was in a serious relationship, and I had no idea at the time. He was a friend of a friend who I had met only once before, I was quite drunk, he initiated it.

The divorce is 100% on the married person. But being a shitty person is a trait that both husband and mistress share in this situation.

she was violating it

If you didn’t make the vows, you’re not cheating. Quit blaming outsiders, it’s nonsensical.

Disagree. In my 20s, I went to clubs a lot and flirted and danced with men, as one does at clubs. Sometimes that flirting and dancing led to making out. It’s not a thing to tell dudes to hold on while I Googled them as they leaned in to kiss me on the dance floor. At least it wasn’t when I was clubbing and going to…

the fuck? NO. Don’t fucking victim blame.

Also, heiress lady didn’t make a vow to anybody. I firmly believe the onus is 100% on the married person. They’re the one that made the vow to their spouse.

Oh I’m sorry, I forgot about the feminist Marches for not stealing men ::Eye roll:: its not a feminist issue because it’s not a gender related issue, that’s kind of a requirement

When they pursue infidelity, especially with someone who already knows the cheater’s marital status, that person who cooperates is even more responsible; they make the act happen.