lastplacetrophy
lastplacetrophy
lastplacetrophy

I thoroughly enjoyed the AA battery being completely ineffective against a slow, lumbering cargo plane. It was totes adorbs (it's early and I'm talking like an idiot). My brother worked on those things for a decade (the Spookies I mean) and he just burst out laughing when we watched it.

To be fair, they did make a great choice:

"** Actually, they're more than supportive on just this subject. Laura also told me that when foreign tourists tip horribly, management will actually go talk to them, ask if the service was alright, and if they say it was, calmly explain American tipping customs to them. Don't worry if you still wanted to lose faith

I can barely handle having one girlfriend, how the fuck does he manage three?!

Because they can't hit back?

I remember it like yesterday; late 1999, a new game was making the rounds touted as The Next Big Thing. It was "The Sims" and I pleaded and begged with my parents. "I'll never ask for another game! It's got everything! I'll never need another game! IT'S GOT EVERYTHING!" Several months went by, and my cries went

HOLY CRAP: Anthony. Bravo sir.

Serious question: I'm a 90% solo player, I almost never play online unless I'm basically forced to. Is this worth picking up? I want it, ever so badly, but I feel like as someone who generally solo plays I'll miss out on a lot of the game.

"Brucie, did you get 'em? Did you get the guy who killed us?" Best part.

I swear I've seen this before somewhere....

By putting Under the Dog up on Kickstarter, its team is free to make whatever the hell they want, and what they've made - there are plans for three 24-min episodes, which will combine to form a single movie - is something that looks pretty badass.

She lost because she's a dumb woman and she shouldn't have left the kitchen.

I'm getting real tired of this:

The sheer stupidity of your idea is making my nose bleed.

Understood, but considering the show was created in Japan, where average height for men is 5'4", and female is 5', it's not "unfair". However, seeing as the point of the show is to literally be unfair, it doesn't matter.

From the video: "She needed to jump a little further back where the walls are closer together"

I'm not complaining? I'm merely pointing out that this is meant to be difficult.

More importantly, the commenter in the video even states that if she had landed a little further into the obstacle she would have been fine. "She needed to jump a little further back where the walls are closer together"

Thanks!

So they should make the obstacle easier for shorter people?

Did you even watch the other video, where she takes the curved wall? That obstacle specifically built to make it harder for short people...

Yes, in a show about completing a difficult obstacle course, how dare they force her to deal with her shortcomings! They should have simply handed her the award, she tried!