Arguably it is unfair for California to otherwise enjoy unimpeachable political influence that South Dakota could never hope to challenge.

And?  You are aware that the Senate is just half of the legislature, yes?

No, I was talking about how everyone is saying ‘men don’t face consequences’ when the reality is that men face most of the consequences.

Why is it dumb?

OK, looks like disdain for rich people still tops disdain for middle America. Will re-evaluate with next anti-Senate/electoral college article.

specter of a man facing consequences

None of that means that the statement corroborates her actual account. That simply corroborates that she told others of an attack previously, with varying details, and without mentioning Kavanaugh.

No, it was a show trial in the court of public opinion that, happily, ended with the entire farce being thrown out.

I’m sorry, we’re the cult?

Does it matter?

“I have evolved on the issue, and have come to realize that it is wrong to impede the president’s constitutional authority to nominate a Supreme Court justice. Sorry.”

You’re normal.

It would help if there was evidence or corroborating witnesses to Kavanaugh assaulting Ford.

Why would a oil company continue to operate if you’re seizing all the profits?

Comes with being a serial rapist, I guess.

Just doing my job, ma’am.

Naw, I think it’s pretty spot on.

Given the shift from coal to natural gas, and the accompanying reduction in CO2 emissions, it seems like capitalism is actually doing a fair job of fighting climate change.

What evidence is there against Kavanaugh?

But for some ‘strange’ reason, it just never happens.