laserfacelvr
Laserfacelvr
laserfacelvr

These are the same people arguing that you can be healthy at any size.  

Really that’s all you’ve got? Someone already posted a related citation, you can go find the rest yourself.

But Michael Phelps has oddly long arms or something!

I mean, all you have to do is scroll down a little further to see a sourced post someone else put up in reference to a study that you think doesn’t exist. 

Pretty much all current scientific research shows that trans females maintain a biological advantage for several years post op, even with reduced testosterone levels if they had gone through puberty as a male.

It seems disingenuous to say that this is simply an attack on trans athletes and that it’s not about protecting fair competition for female athletes when there is no one pushing for banning trans men from competition. If it were just about oppressing trans people there would be blanket bans, not only bans based on

How so? I believe, the movie resonated with so many Americans - and their fear of being seen as “Racist”, while being insulated doing racist things and looking through a racist lens and thus, gets an oscar.

That was my reaction! Every day a school day.

Not really, no. Don’t be be surprised when such appeals are denied. They likely will be.

Euphoria gets a lot of acclaim. I don’t think the explicitness of the material matters or is holding it back. But Zendaya is the main and her story is very big so of course it overshadows the rest.

I don’t need to watch a trial to read Heard’s op-ed and understand what it says and doesn’t says

Well, if you can decide questions of fact and law without listening to the evidence, then that’s definitely a skill! I truly hope you find a use for it somewhere. I hope that use is outside a jury box, but I do hope you find a use for it nonetheless.

Her lawyer this time wasn’t cheap though, and she had amazing credentials and past successes.  Heard didn’t cheap out on a lawyer.

It’s obviously true that people with money can afford better lawyers, but I don’t think anyone can fairly argue that Amber Heard was poor, and moreover, her lawyer has excellent credentials!  I was surprised when I read about them because she is apparently a crack lawyer who anyone, prior to this trial, would have

You mean “nope” to yourself right? Just because you disagree with the verdict and hate Depp, doesn’t mean the juror/jury was wrong or is how you think and want Virginia law to work. See ElectricSheep and my posts up and down this thread as to why. AVClub commenter bias and opinions do not apply in a court of law or to

What about the female jurors, then? What about that this person also said the evidence didn’t lead them to believe the case was proven? Are you going to continue to insult and mock strangers because they didn’t vote how you insisted they should?

The full quote from the juror is that they didn’t believe he physically abused her, which was the crux of the defamation.

Yeah I’ve learned that the vast majority of people who can turn on and off the waterworks at will are not generally trustworthy.

It was rigged, I’m the real winner

Making determinations about the credibility of a witness is and always has been a key role for a finder of fact whether that's a judge or a jury, sorry that well-established part of the legal system makes you uncomfortable.