Well, I mean of course this is Jalopnik. Most of the people drive 10-20 year old cars and can hardly afford anything better, so they spend most of the time hating. Hence why Jalopnik is looked down upon on most forums like Bimmerpost, Luxury4Play, AudiZine, AcuraZine, MBWorld etc..

Ehhhhhh. I'm not so sure. I agree 1000000% on the manual front, but Acura has to make a profit, and no matter how good the manual was on the TSX/TL, barely anyone bought them. Unfortunately, thats just the world we live in. But the current shiftable AT is actually decently quick with shifts, and this new Dual clutch…

what?

Yea I had one, tons of fun. Just recently sold it for an e90 m3. But of course this is jalopnik, so no matter what I say or do, my 201 hp N/A TSX is inferior to the 180hp 320i, even tho I've driven both extensively.

Your right..290 hp and AWD are not fun to drive at all. WTF Acura, the RWD 180hp 320i is the same price is way better.

Your right.. 0-60 in 5.2.. How very slow that TL was.

Umm... What? BMW offers 3 engines in the 3er range. You Jalopnik guys really don't know what the fuck you talk about do you?

Because Jalopnik rides BMW's D!ck? The 320i is a pretty poor driving car.. my mom has one. My 2G TSX was a better driver.

I'm sorry.. Maybe I don't understand your post, but they progressed in suspension, transmission, power band, etc..

How fucking stupid can you Jalopnik guys be? The 320i has 180hp, the ATS 2.5 has less hp, the C250 has less hp etc.. And low 7's?!? Are you guys retarded? Thats the current TSX. Subtract 7.5 - 1.5 = 6