laencythe
ILaen'Cythe
laencythe

Bigger =/= better.

Both?

Sony going out of their way not to gouge their consumers? Ha!

I find it funny and sad, how much this reminds me of 2004.

Maybe Bethesda should take note: Bigger not equal better.

That's interesting to know, actually.

That be dangerous talk 'ter talk 'round these parts, m'strangerrr.

Hey, I guess this is awesome for PC gamers, and if it helps the game become a smoother experience and iron out the bugs and glitches, the better.

Looks clunky and slow.

It's not that I'm saying I prefer one over the other, or that one is bad, but just that they are different things that serve different purposes.

But they didn't turn Mickey into a sewer rat that bites the head off it's enemies.

You can ask for Nintendo to do something different, a new game franchise, that would perhaps be darker than what they do now. I'm fine with that.

We can handle it, we have been for years, you know, playing the call of and gears of and god of games for years.

I hope it's not the case, for you. It sucks having to give up on something you enjoy because of lazy coding.

Then they have to take longer development times, or hire more testers, or do a beta.

That is good to hear, at least for PC gamers.

You might take this personally, but know it really isn't:

A game can be as great in content as it wants, if it's broken it's broken, and people should learn to be more demanding of quality in the products they pay for.

And yet it will be GOTY, wanna bet?

More so as it gets little attention in the media, so it's not boring and samey like the feudal period.