Man, Deadspin is just chomping at the bit to get something on Barstool, but mostly just playing into their trolling of hysterical liberal reactions.

The zone tonight was a goddamn mess all around, but yeah, Judge has gotten screwed all season on low pitches. Fangraphs researched this and showed it is a legit problem.

So many props to Todd Frazier (DID YOU KNOW HE’S FROM JERSEY?!) for emerging as a huge team leader. These guys are legit fun to watch.

Umpires need to realize that Judges knees are a lot higher than other dudes knees are. He chases way to many of those low pitches anyway, but he isn’t getting any help from the umpires when he manages to lay off of them either.

I mean, sure, when you go up 2-0 you should probably win, but the Yanks were fucking relentless. Brett’s EPIC 12-pitch at bat tonight summed up New York’s approach in games 3-5.

This is now the second time in a month that ESPN has fallen on its face while trying to discipline one of its biggest personalities for daring to talk politics on Twitter.

Nah, Barstool blows dogs for quarters as does this site and it’s shitty writing. PMT however is beyond both in quality and deadspin being dead set on cutting it down is baffling. Punching up is one thing but when you’re a shell of your former self going against people that are doing what you were known for and on a…

Wait, I think I got it, guys. He’s calling wresting fake.

Because they are having matches in the context of the fictional television storyline. QED.

Because not everyone is such a twat.

They don’t mind them protesting, they just don’t like the way they are protesting. Wait a minute...

Sometimes the message does appear to be “NO MATTER WHAT, FIND A WAY TO BE MAD AT THE NFL. THIS IS PARAMOUNT.”

But I like to give folks an opportunity to tell me what I am missing, so my questions are genuine.

“Kneeling is good, it’s drawing attention to a cause”

OK, so time for my new favorite thing: ask Deadspin.

You can run 7 on 7 though.

For the love of god, just switch to anal.

Empathy is not a policy. Does empathy demand that we let in 2 million immigrants a year? 3 million? 4 million? 30 million? There are over 3 billion people living on less than $2.50 a day. Does empathy demand that we let all of them in today?

What does the reason for the Democratic Party being on the other side of this issue have to do with this though? Every political party does what they do to get votes. The problem is that 1 party is doing something that most people find reprehensible and immoral to get the votes, while the other is not.

As long as we’re being reductive and ungenerous, I’d point out that being on the side of “stacking the court (electorate) with foreigners” is going to win anyone awards for keeping the moral high ground anytime soon.

“Pretty much every single article I’ve ever read that whines about how “no one votes these days” completely fails to mention that this is the desired outcome of decades of legislation specifically designed to make voting inconvenient and expensive. Nope, it’s just those damn lazy Millennials!!!!”