Plus she used fractions, which probably count as witchcraft to the average Trump voter.

Yeah I was kinda wondering if she was throwing some shade there. Can we get a Shade Court Ruling on this?

The only thing that surprises me about this story is the woman’s name. Emirjeta Xhelili sounds pretty “foreign” herself. But then again, hypocrites are Trump’s #1 demographic.

With an all-American girl-next-door name like Emirjeta Xhelili, I can see why she’d be suspicious of people that don’t seem to belong.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archi…

“To just be grossly generalistic”

Not all Trump supporters are bigots, but all bigots.......

What a bunch of PC whiners. She’s just telling it like it is.

I honestly think you hit the nail on the head there.

Big fancy libtard woooorrrdds!

She had a great followup to one of the mouthbreathers:

Boy, the Republicans can dish it out, but they sure as hell can’t take it. That much is for sure.

Maybe she regrets saying only half when in fact she meant all?

Here is the original quote (From her fundraiser in NYC 9/9/16) :

Thank you for sharing that! She absolutely hit the nail on the head - if someone isn’t a racist assbag, why be mad at Hillary for calling out the racist assbags?

She could’ve avoided the whole thing by simply adding ‘some of them, I assume, are good people’ at the end of her original speech.

Ok, I am admittedly really really really bad at this, but I need a ruling. Her follow-up (the full one, not what’s written above) is shade, no?

PC culture is out of control. You call some people deplorable and they get all offended.

“I regret saying ‘half’—that was wrong,” Clinton said.

I think part of this ‘controversy’ is fueled by Clinton using a ten-cent word like ‘deplorables’ as opposed to something Trump would have used (clowns, bozos, assholes, Mexicans etc.). It makes the phrase sound elitist.