kremk0in
kremkoin
kremk0in

It would be dry humor. Good for you if you don't think it's funny, but it's still humor.

Tims pretty well known for making jokes without making it clear he's making a joke. It's very possible he's being sarcastic.

I think this is the first time after reading a Tim Rogers article that I haven't seen numerous Tim Rogers responses to comments. I think for your next article you should write how your track suits are similiar to your articles...at first they might piss people off to no end...but in the end we (should) realize variety

While looking through this falls guide and accepting the fact I am going to be on the street from dishing out so much money this Christmas, I realized my once anticipated final fantasy xiv had been now forgotten by me, and further that it hasn't even been released yet on ps3! So my question extends to those of you

I'm guessing that the reason alot of people are arguing back, like myself, is the fact of whether or not they have added any content beyond making it "prettier". If you still feel like that extra content isn't really worth squat, then thats your opinion. I suppose "prettier" is somewhat vague, so if somehow within

"The characters weren't likeable." They've said in various magazines and videos they are working to make people feel like more than just stepping stones to actually beating the quests, so I'm assuming that is something they are improving on in comparison. "The human character models were ugly as sin." Obviously a

i agree completely, and further i never beat all the boss creatures you could face if you went around and used the capture weapons, so I'm happy to get a 2nd chance. Also I'm going to lose my mind if dark aeons come to the american version...

favorite final fantasy remade? One of the first "remakes" I will absolutely pick up. I need to know this second if the dark aeons will be in the American remake....sweet lord how i long to beat them....

I love everything about this comment

thanks everyone for the comments. Honestly, as much as at times I'd like to screw gamestop over and get away with it (and get the credit for games)...I decided i would feel worse about doing it than the financial benefit....and the possibility of a local manager taking the fall would make me feel worse.

a somewhat shady question...I have a 120gb ipod that about 6 months ago had coffee spilled all over it, and now won't hold a charge for more than about 5 minutes...but it still works perfectly if you plug it in and keep it charged. Do you think Gamestop would A.even accept it for trade in in the 1st place. and B. if

The reason people usually get banned with posting things like "slow news day" (on top of it being part of the sites rules) is answered when you think of what this statement adds to the post. The answer is nothing. Nothing at all. If you don't care for a post, please just move on.

it doesn't really have to do with being specifically noob unfriendly, but in my opinion the community as a whole is generally unfriendly, or perhaps immature is more accurate. I play it and still have fun with other friends, but my first order of business is to just go through and mute everyone with a mic before said

the battlefield games do a good job of encouraging team play with plenty of points given for spotting, healing, providing ammo, etc...along with the fact you can jump into a squad really pushes home they want you to work as a team. Though I never played it i heard MAG also encouraged it

I'm not going to get into the debate of whether it's appropriate for said user to take on Jesus in a semi-humorous light or not... I just wanted to point out this is one of the worst slippery slope fallacies I've ever seen that you're using. Tam made very, very offensive statements to intentionally draw attention.

i really appreciate you making this point, i would encourage everyone to look through comments and see how many times an attacking the person fallacy is used rather than addressing Christianity or the argument itself. I constantly get people who will respond to an argument i make with this type of debate.

romans 1:26-27

actually, that proves a point that i try to make often, that on this issue people on very opposite sides of the fence can completely agree. An atheist can agree that biblically it's wrong, which is exactly what i am saying. Respectful debate really isn't that hard when you take out extremists (on both sides), and this