I have no idea if he’s actually verified by a writer (I wouldn’t be surprised), but you can be ungreyed for a specific comment section if another ungreyed commenter stars or responds to your post; one reason why engaging with grey trolls is inadvisable.

Don’t engage the troll. That doesn’t help in the least.

If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.

He’s SUPER good at being told “no,” too.  This much is clear.

Hatch must have gotten a boner.

Yeah, that took me a back too.

Hatch said “she’s an attractive person”?!?! Wtf does that have to do with Dr. Ford being a credible witness, or not. Ffs, this is Trump level bs. How stupid is Hatch to comment on a sexual assault victims appearance? Guess if she was ugly, they'd use the "Brett wouldn't mess with her, he could have had way more…

The fact that they hate her so much just makes me love her more. Although they’re wetting their pants with glee over the idea of replacing RBG, women’s rights crusader, with Coney Barrett, a woman who believes women don’t need rights. It’s practically a sexual kink for republicans at this point (barf).

It’s got nothing to do with fear—they simply don’t have any say in it. They can vote to reject him, but there’s nothing the Republican Party can do until this asshole gets to the Senate floor to force Trump to withdraw him from consideration. And Trump won’t do it because admitting that attempted rape is a…

That’s Mike Judge. Mark Judge was in Vice Versa with Fred Savage.

Leave it to a very, very small-brained hater and loser Dem to quote the fat guy from Swingers when the post was about the creator of Beavis and Butthead.

I wonder what the other hate goblins on the short list for this job think about all of this nonsense.

Trump is going to announce it was Rod Rosenstein.

Imagine it? We fucking pray for it. Over and over.

I don’t think the GOP would have trouble finding another partisan justice happily in the tank for the Republican party, but I do think that they’re legitimately worried they might lose control the Senate and that ramming a SCOTUS nominee through a lame duck session is terrible optics. I really can’t see any reason why…

I think it’s a mix of they really just want to stick it to liberals, like if they proudly vote for enough rapists then women will give up on this #MeToo stuff and they’ll go back to acting like it’s the 80s again, and partially that Kavanaugh is dirty and compromised enough that they won’t have to worry about another…

Even in the unlikely event that the next congress is going to be Democratically-controlled, I would presume that the Senate would rush through a Supreme Court nominee in their lame-duck session. It actually would make more sense for Republicans to abandon Kavanaugh now and find someone better as soon as possible. 

The real question now is why Republicans are trying to push forward with his nomination. In a sane world, it makes no sense. When Bush put forward a bad nominee, he withdrew her name after it became evident that her confirmation would be difficult. There are probably at least twenty very high-quality conservative…

“...smearing a man who maintains his innocence and has cleared six FBI background checks.”

A black teen in Texas was expelled for refusing to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. The Texas attorney general is siding with the school board, because we live in hell.