The answer to that question is always yes: Anyone can really sue for anything. The question is phrased stupidly.

That would be fun as well.

Really hoping the Jays sneak “God Save the Queen” in there if they make it that far. Might end the stupid thing once and for all.

+1

I’m just hoping nobody tries to mimic the awful ads from the 1992 constitution referendum (also during October that year). The MILF hitting on Joe Carter every inning is awful enough.

It’s one thing to be ugly and classic, but to be ugly and modern...

I love this team.

It may be a desperate attempt by a layperson to try and kill the criminal case despite knowing it’ll result in Kane getting destroyed the civil one.

I remember in University there was an interesting discussion about how “shaming” would be far more effective than jail, which only punishes certain individuals. Would VW shareholders rather have a few easily replaceable minds in jail/probation, or have to run a cigarette-pack like ad on every one of their ads for 10…

Use of the corporate approved nickname, another plus.

John Schnatter: [cums]

The Gilmour one especially, it was a straight up blackmail attempt.

The Guy Lafleur one is incredibly misleading.

I’m getting that impression as well.

I’ve lived in Toronto and other parts of Canada, so I can see there is a definite difference geographically in these things.

I think another commenter put it best, it’s something that, if you’re going to have it, would work far better at the beginning than partway through. Once you have 2-3 years or more together,…

“But if maintaining your current relationship and having sex with other people are both high priorities for you, addressing this head on shouldn’t be any scarier than the alternative of ruining your relationship through deception while you cheat.”

The subtlety here was very well done.

To be fair, I think a lot of women would initially respond with “how intriguing! can you explain your reasoning?” to give their partner a bit of rope to hang themselves with.

That’s what gets me...even the question will hit some people like a trainwreck.

I’m far from being religious/judgmental of sexual attitudes, everyone’s different, but life experiences teach that some things in life don’t repair/come back. Asking that question would do it for a lot of (if not most) people.

“But it’s tiresome for anyone to make their sexuality the sum of their identity, and to foist constant conversations about those sexual and romantic inclinations on everyone else.”

That was excellent. Thank you.

Allez vous faire foutre, con.