knights-errant
Knights-Errant
knights-errant

It’s established fact and logic that any matter from Krypton is affected in the same way as the Kryponians themselves, becoming more durable under the yellow solar radiation as their molecular structure is re-arranged. This would make Zod being stabbed by a piece of wreckage accidentally during their fight, or even

If Zod had died in a manner similar to the manner in which Doomsday was killed in the comics it would have been a much more acceptable finale (although the rest of the film was a piece o crap, so it still wouldn’t have worked for me personally) - he never killed Doomsday on purpose. He just kept hitting him until he

Thank you, Gizmo for mentioning what he did to that trucker. I am the only one I know who ever brings that up. What he did was amazingly vicious for a case of sexual harrasment. He ruined that man’s livelihood and may have made it impossible for him to secure further employment in the future. But here’s another thing

Of course, you could also do something silly like A. Sign the villains on for a multiple film clause that allows you to use them if you want to or not use them if you don’t (which happens all the time in Hollywood with series), and B. Meet your audience expectation. Just a thought.

Bruce deliberately chose to act in a way which led to Harvey’s death. He did not deliberately choose to kill Harvey. There is a difference. He tackled him because he had no other way to remove him from that situation, but he did not know for a fact that he would fall the way that he did, that he would land on top of

I agree, LMD. The logical choice and the moral choice are not the same thing, something that both Superman and Batman understand. The logical choice would be to kill everyone who committed a crime. After all, if they are willing to break the law, they are unreliable and disruptive elements of society who are likely to

This would have passed as a better explanation for Clark’s choice to kill Zod if it weren’t for two facts. 1. Clark showed zero concern for anyone he didn’t know personally throughout the entire battle sequence. He may have acted to save the planet he lives on (so, clearly, we can establish it as a wholly selfless

Though it isn’t what I prefer from Bruce, I think it is a different scenario. Ra’s had a chance to save himself, if only a slim one, something that Clark didn’t give Zod in Man of Steel. Further, Bruce is only human. He has less options available to him than Superman does. Of course, as an avid fan of the character

Your argument is based on the impression that there are numerous superhero franchises. DC’s only franchises in the film arena are Batman and Superman related (aside from the Green Lantern failure that I’d just as soon forget about.) This makes the argument that not nearly as many superheroes in films are killing their