That usually gets out of staters in NY all the time. NY requires you to move over if you can. Troopers were filling courtrooms with Canadians and Pennsyltuckians that merely slowed down.

If she is actually 54 good for her. Not just on the looks front... There would appear to be a giant ten year hole in her resume between high school and college. To rise to the top in that manner would be impressive.

That’s fine, but she is 45.

At first I thought she was the youngest looking 54 year old ever. Which is a weird person to be discriminated against, on account of age. She is 45. Last time I thought of 45 as old was right around High School graduation. Guess I’m old.

Riesling was historically produced in nearly all manner of sweetness. When the world was drinking 8% RS boxed wine, Riesling became associated with low-end sweet.

What’s with the Island wine? I don’t know specifically about all of the islands but Sicily is a good example. Vast piles of growing degree days lead to big California type wines with low to medium acidity and high brix. So, the opposite of bright, breezy and airy. You’re going to need a more mild climate for that.

...O…

No, I genuinely like their flexibility. If .5 seconds was a total failure they’d just change it. Baseball would start debating it about 30 years after the public did and then probably change it to .5005

Great suggestion. I’m with you, I have no idea how much time is the right amount. Knowing the NFL they’d change it every year. You do have to love their fanbase for allowing them to change the game all the time. Baseball fans freak out over minor tweaks in the rule. NFL is all good, as long as it is in the spirit of…

I totally agree with you. My only devils advocate argument is that you might just be shifting the grey area. When the ball touches the receiver’ss hands and the LB immediately hits him with the force of three semis... how do we know if he caught the ball and fumbled or the ball just happened to touch his hand.

You need a civics lesson to further develop your opinion. I’ve tried.

First, no but you started making random assumptions about me. In a historical context our system of government was not tyrannical. Tyranny is illegitimate concentrated power, usually a single person. If the constitution dilutes a person’s vote it isn’t tyranny because the power is still legitimate.

Seriously? We didn’t directly vote for senators or the President and you think the intent was to disenfranchise the already disenfranchised. You can disagree with the effectiveness but not the intent of the founders.

I guess based on your definition of tyranny, we’ve always been a tyranny and now we are slightly less…

I disagree. I really don’t mind the status quo. I don’t think voting districts should be geographically based because that is just arbitrary. If lines are drawn by state representatives we are in fact voting for the house district lines that they choose. Recently this has helped republicans on the national stage…

So would you be voting for a person or a party to represent you in the house? How do I know if my vote gets a Trump into the house or a R. Paul?

A state by state winner take all popular vote is full of unintended consequences. It does virtually nothing to protect minority voice. 49% African American? No voice for you.

It sounds like you want a parliamentary government that apportions popular vote amongst parties. Good news, it protects the voice of minorities. Bad news, it protects the voice of minorities. Such a system doesn’t distinguish between african americans and nazis.

Computers with software generated by humans. Although, first you’d have to convince me that gerrymandering is inherently evil. As far as I can tell it’s the worst form of representation, except all the others.

I’ve never been able to get 3rd party apps to send mms whether I’m on wifi or not.

Oh! Maybe it’ll fix all my problems.