Now that is called an “Argumentum ad Populum”. It means that your appeal to “EVERYONE” isn’t an argument.

Which is why trying to talk to you is infuriating.

Well, I’m proud of him. He has real principles.

I don’t care if this man can’t keep it in his pants. I want him in congress.

This is political. Weiner is an actual leftist dem and the party has been purging for many years now.

This is about silencing someone who was very effective at shaming centrists like Clinton.

While everyone wants to make Clinton’s intentional evading of US federal law in her server-bypassing-FoIA issue “cool” we have literally run one of the most liberal congressmen out of office. This works for Clinton, as Weiner was a problem for pushing too far left constantly.

I want this man in congress:

Yep. That’s an ad-hom.

I want this man in congress. I’m sorry.

I don’t care. I really don’t.

I found it! Here we go... this is actually about a 9/11 responded health bill.

You know, I watched a David Cross show recently where he was very rational about this. He made a whole joke about people walking out of his show because he gets VERY political. His joke was something like, “People buy tickets to see Tobias! They think Tobias is gonna do comedy! He’ll slip and fall and everyone will…

They need to put aside their zero-sum mentalities to actually understand that Title IX protects men as well as women.

I don’t know because I don’t take the actions of a single person as evidence for the actions of a group. That is the literal definition of bigotry.

Look. You’re deflecting. Is it okay to organize a campaign of harassment while recruiting further harassers via clearly recruiting tweets?

Well, that book should say that you’re engaging in ad-hom attacks. If you understood logic you wouldn’t lay such bullshit at the foot of logic. Logic specifically calls what you’re doing an “appeal to authority” in which you provide no evidence nor argument but assume a place or superiority based on authoritarian…

Mostly because you’re incapable of seeing objective concepts.

Jesus Christ, you’re consistent belief that all human behavior is bad is your downfall.

Seriously now, you are embarrassing yourself. That’s not an ad hominem. Literally nothing you have applied the phrase to so far has qualified.