I know one of them personally - one of the ones who showed up and was interviewed in the multiple docs that have come out.  Her name rhymes with Megan Bradford.  SHE’S A FUCKING NUT.  She loves the attention this brings her.  It makes her feel closer to her idol Britney.  She spends so much time on it - I used to tell…

The partition plan was the only avenue available to stop both communities trying to butcher each other in the streets at that time, and yes overall for the whole of the Mandate it was estimated at one third Jewish and two thirds Muslim. The problem is that it drastically differed depending on where you were, with…

“Forcing civilians from their land, taking it, and then refusing them the ability to return, I’m pretty sure, actually is considered a war crime.”

We never ask that for any other country on earth.

The only valuable parts of the documentary were the attorney interviews that shed more light into how conservatorships work and the evolution of her conservatorship. Everything else was horror porn and speculation. One record producer made an entire set of assumptions about Jamie Spears based on one thing he said…

Is having your teen sex tape released without consent into the wild (and distributed by media) not real world harm...? I didn’t watch the PH doc and I have no skin in the game, but you haven’t responded to KittenNinja’s point re: the revenge porn (and media having to take responsibility for reporting on…

How do you even begin to compare Paris Hiltons behavior to Fucking Chris Brown. He literally beats woman and has been accused of rape!

Okay, this is a bad take on Hilton for a few reasons:

LOL! I rewound that announcement to see if I heard it right followed by instant doubt of that money actually going to charity. Would be hilarious to see two weeks of $1 champions just so that he leaves with as little money as possible.

I also disagree with the premise of this article on the basis of this utterly awesome article about this film written by Charlie Jane Anders for io9 back in 2010.

I said exactly the same thing (but with more words, and less well) below! There are so many things to love about that casual act of brutal dismemberment review, so I’ll just offer one of the many glittering lines for your delectation:

My head has been spinning over this. I never thought I would see self-described left-wing people argue that giving more money to high income earners would be good for “the economy.”

I agree totally. I really wanted kids, but I’m infertile, and found this out during a massive baby boom in my office. I’m positive some people got some dead weird responses from me, and I’m really thankful none of them were humanities scholars who unpacked my statement, because regardless of what came out what I meant…

You can ask someone if they’re excited that they’re going to have a baby.

Telling people alternate lines isn’t all that helpful. You find “Are you excited?” to be intrusive, but not “How are you feeling?” and blanket advise people to ask the latter. But I’ve known pregnant women who HATE “How are you feeling?” I’ve been told forever to never, EVER ask “Is there anything I can do?” because…

Quick question about the throuple. I didn’t see that episode but how is it that,

I don’t (personally) think it’s all that reductive, if the concern is that attempting to do this via an EO is a terrible plan if someone can just override it next time.

Yes, in classic mathematics $50,000 > $10,000, good spot.

So, at the risk of “libsplaining” this is... incredibly consistent with what Biden’s been saying since he’s been campaigning. Further, average debt isn’t quite as useful as median debt — since the people with significant ($200K+) debt throws the average out of whack.

Can this same be logic be used to hold to Lifehacker/Giz accountable when we are given a politically charged or opiniated article that has no reason to be written in the editorial space?