kirivinokurjr
kirivinokurjr
kirivinokurjr

Their vicious fighting and hatred for each other disappointed, devastated and ultimately killed Philip Seymour Hoffman.

On a tiny and incredibly uncomfortable porch swing, too! I mean, I can get onboard with the possibility of time travel, but that nap just wasn’t believable.

Linklater’s Before trilogy is really incredible in how it explored a relationship’s ups and downs from youth to middle age, but the action scenes really suffered.

There’s also a dash of laziness that’s driving decisions like this. It’s much easier to write about a boy and a girl meeting for the first time and seeing that puppy love move forward than it is to write something interesting about people who’ve been a couple for a little bit of time, especially involving Ali who was

The pendulum will swing back and Bettany will play the lead in The Little Mermaid.

I’m thinking it’s Mark Hamill.

Ex-squeeze me?

Like Chris Pratt in that Mario movie!

Like Chris Pratt in that Mario movie!

I think we can easily see how else this manifests itself outside of discussions around the MCU. I think it’s easy to see how the desire to maximize receipts in China is influencing screenwriting (or edits to), in that it’s pretty infrequent nowadays to see Hollywood portray the Chinese state in anything approximating

I think this is where the disagreement lies. One can look at today’s environment as no different from the normal ‘entertainment is a business’ idea, or one can be on the other side of the fuzzy boundary where the financials are exerting disproportionate influence over whether or not a movie gets made. I’ll say

Meh, I think a lot of people will resort to jokes about grandpa yelling at a cloud because the message is coming from an old-guard Boomer, but I bet there’s a lot of agreement with the general message, so this doesn’t feel controversial. Consideration for receipts is why you have negotiations over final cut. And most

But who’s playing the gelatinous cube?

Even the Amy-Adams-looking-hot parts?!?

I’m basing it on the stories in the article, especially the Lucy Liu ‘disagreement’. Sure, he can do all this lovable stuff like crashing engagement photoshoots, but the negative stories are also no secret.

If we can have CGI Harold Ramis, we can have CGI Bill Murray.

This is a corny take, but this is an example of someone powerful just using fear of humiliation to get their way, even just simply to flex, or whatever their motivation is. It’s a common line in movies, but it’s the first thing I think of: Murray gets his way not because people respect him but because people (I

I hear prints will be shipped to theaters under the fake title “Women Be Talking”.

I’m up for watching anything Emma Mackey is in, and I thought she was pretty good in Nile, but I’m starting to develop an allergy to Gal Gadot to find her poor acting to be a real distraction.

Good lord, I’m not a fan of this new colloquial use of “literally” for emphasis, but you’re acting like that’s the biggest offense in the world and started off the conversation being unnecessarily harsh on Doctor Professor. You could have made an argument that stood on its own merits, but you took the dickhead route