This is true, but my levels I set for my music are a lot different than the levels I like for my movies and videos. I also like tweaking depending on the genre of music. It's a really basic feature on any audio player, both iTunes and Windows Media Player have had one since inception. I really can't imagine why it…

Unfortunately, I'm on a Mac and there is no Equalify alternative yet...

All this is fine, but my main problem with Spotify is the lack of an EQ. Don't get me wrong, I love Spotify and I gladly pay for premium, but an EQ would really push it to the top for me.

Also, if you're reading this article and you own a Mac and you want to play Diablo III, you're probably fine. Move along.

Finally! Someone who understands! The show isn't about the zombies as much as it's about what people would do in a catastrophic event like a zombie apocalypse and what happens to people brought up in modern society when that society crumbles. It's the interactions between the humans that make the show captivating. If…

Exactly what I was thinking.

>>The only tablet on the market with this feature

I love how Gizmodo cuts out the B.S. of everything in the gadget world, but I have been noticing a lot more hate than usual. Luckily, I agree with 99% of it.

I like all the snarky, passive-aggressive comments the G+ users are making about "efficiency".

It's been waaaaay to long after Google+'s release for it to start massively adding users. Social Networking may take money, but the last thing you want is to have a social network (especially one powered by such a huge company) open for months without making a significant dent in Facebook's user base.

tl;dr You can make a great movie with picture and no sound, you can't make a great movie with no picture and all sound. Likewise for video games (but to a lesser degree).

I guess I'm not being clear enough with my point: Both a movie and a video game are inherently defined by their visuals, which are essential, lest they be nothing but a radio drama and a plain game.

I'm not saying that audio isn't important in a film, of course it can turn a good film into a great film and good sound design can affect the audience in unusual ways (look at David Lynch's work).

The problem with this question is that it equates a lack of one medium as being the same as a lack of another medium in a multifaceted piece of art, as well as comparing film (a passive form of entertainment) with video games (an active form of entertainment).

Moneyball was actually really good. It had the "Social Network Effect", a movie that sounds kinda boring in theory, but was, in reality, brilliantly done and captivating.

Microphone is most commonly abbreviated as mic, not mike #corrections

And your point? They hated the screen size. They also mentioned in the actual review that the stylus (it's most touted feature) didn't work 100% of the time and that the phone felt plasticy. It's a huge screen. Too big for most people. I know I would hate having a phone that size and hate having a tablet that size.…

But they do give the time of day to other stuff. Just because they love their iPhone and hate the Note doesn't mean they're not being objective. I remember a very positive review of the Galaxy Nexus and, just today, praise for Samsung's waterproof phone. If you don't want to hear bad reviews for an android phone, then…

But what if you don't want an android phone, but you want people to think you have an android phone... no one wants people to think they have an android phone.

itt: butthurt Note users trying to justify using a phone that's as big as Zack Morris' circa 1989.