kingkrazyxx
kingkrazyxx
kingkrazyxx

Jesus, Giz. Desperate for clicks much? 

Salty

Exactly. This is the beginning of humanity truly becoming a space fairing race. I hate how every writer on here thinks that anyone that is not a starving artist is a jerk.

Do some real financial planning, get a real career, and stop screaming at windmills.

Tourism is a waste.

Given that Covid is here to stay, like influenza, and will continue to mutate into different variants, how long are you planning to wait before people are allowed to resume their normal lives?  Never?

Personally, I can’t shake the sense that it’s just a beat too early to congregate by the thousands in a cramped, sweaty convention hall.

Haters gonna hate. I enjoyed it as well. 

Sure, that may be what’s happening at Activision. I’m not following what is or isn’t happening with them; I didn’t see anything in this article about their percentage of white vs. other employees. And is it known that the white guys were under-qualified (honest question)? If so, then yes, that’s messed up (and stupid

It’s almost like someone’s “diversity” has nothing to do with how well they would perform the job being interviewed for.  Forcing more diverse hiring doesn’t magically make qualified candidates appear that fit that bill.

EEO is fair and logical. Diversity for the sake of diversity is stupid. Being non-exclusionary is not the same as being necessarily-diverse.  Businesses exist to make money, not friends. Anything they can do to ethically attain that goal should not be regulated. Not having employees who are not <insert race/gender/ethn

and that’s ok. I never said these practices are ok. There’s a trickle down effect, these practices don’t start or stop at the directors. They come from other people making decisions saying get it done by XYZ date, with this much money, with this many people. Again, to my point, there are aspects of this that there are

Hey and I get that. I’m not saying your situation does not apply or doesn’t matter, in any way. There will always be something better, and you are 100% correct that its not somebody else’s job to look out for you and that applies to many aspects of life. It’s without a doubt that the field is competitive and there

I replied this to someone below and I am going to paste it here as well. The reality is that there will always be something better out there and that’s obviously a fact. It’s also not so easy to just pick up and go somewhere “better or different” and that shows how much of a naïve take you have on the world if you

The point is, some of these people are just doing their job whether they like it or not. Lets not take the little recognition they deserve over some things that they have little to no control over. Keep licking that boot though.

Hard to believe considering even the Director only has so much control over whether or not there will be crunch. This falls entirely on studio management rather than how the game was directed. Crunch doesn’t come from the director. Crunch comes from trying to meet stupid deadlines set by management that has a terrible

Video games want so much to be like movies in every respect, except when it comes to their labor practices.

I literally addressed that they should have included the warning regardless. It’s in the first sentence of my 3rd paragraph, but way to dance around what I wrote. People just love to look for anything to lay blame on except for themselves.

It likely does have a warning. The 1 they are talking about was the review verison without certification. They prolly required it to be certified. I’ve honestly only seen like 1 game with a warning tho. Those lights aren’t used to cause seizes in dr offices, that’s incorrectly reported by article. Majority don’t have

Congress makes these decisions, not the president, and congress can also overrule a presidents veto. It’s amazing how many people don’t have a basic understanding of how our government works. You’re so focused on the trump hate train you refuse to see that senators and house reps are just as much part of the problem

Naw usually from a law standpoint misconduct has to be serious enough to destroy the relationship between employee and employer. I dont think taking a few stationary items is enough to “destroy” that relationship.