Every game yeah.

lol :p

Point, click. Point, ... click. Point ... oh wait move forward, click.

There goes the usual "No this [xxx] was better" flow of comments, like on any opinion article.

Also, to prove the non-relevancy of such results, if the question would have been :

Drastically making the choice to not buy a console for that reason is simply stupid.

LOL

Oh Kotaku, I love you so much.

That picture with his cat reflects perfectly the power of imagery, or how people can't look past a picture.

"to broaden the fan base" ....

This is sad.

Guillemot being french, and the last AC being so close to French Revolution, you can be 200% sure the next one will be about French Revolution. The event is just too big to be missed by a natively french studio.

I really don't like the industrialized pace the franchise have taken from Brotherhood.

Like someone else wrote, they could have simply made their own new game with a game engine. At least there would have been "new gameplay".

I think you don't get the real complaint : what anti-DLC people are feeling is not that they have to buy stuff. It's that they see yet another great franchise prostituting itself to microtransactions. Microtransactions are anti-immersive. So in a game that was all about immersion, you can get the deception ...…

The Michael Bay-isation of videogames.

Gears of Space 3.

Nice one :p

You're exactly the that type of commenter described in the article : you don't read what you're commenting, deploying a template of "some kind" of general mood you got against "some kind" of people you hate, absolutely not caring about the relevancy of your argument.

Now where's the "Like" button ... :p