kimakins
Khia213
kimakins

"My friends are black! I wasn't raised rich! They're articulate! You're more racist than I am!" Give her the Kewpie doll. She wins this round of Racism defensiveness Bingo!

I insulted Prince...and he liked it. Short version - We were at one of his concerts that was a fundraiser for some charity. The venue held 30,000 people but only 5000 tickets were offered for sale. For some reason, Prince and the band arrived two hours late. (Unknown to us, the air traffic control system at the

And here I thought nothing could make me vote republican!

I had been engaged to the quintessential Buppie and it ended, not with a bang but a whimper. It wasn't three months later, I heard he was engaged to some thick thighed heifer he met at a Corvette convention. I has been waiting to hear from law school and got accepted after the break up. He didn't know. About a

Right there with you, sister. I knew at age 9 that I did not want children. No oohing and aaahing over babies at any point in my life. Tried to get a tubal ligation at 25, only to have my gynecologist refuse. Now, at 56, I wouldn't have changed a thing. Parenting is not for everyone and it would be great if some

So, Kanye's not in the mirror. What's more interesting to me is, Kim managed to get herself all dressed and made up, but couldn't be bothered to put clothes on her child.

I don't know why this data should be surprising. Black men were lynched for even looking at a white woman in the past. It has everything to do with ownership. White men believed themselves to be better than all other races and as such, entitled to the use of all others. This included white women. Only they are allowed

Go for it. Rewrite most of the legal system. I'll wait.

Think about property. The parties buy a home with joint assets. Party 1 wants out. The three/ four/ five other parties now have to sell the house to give her her share, displacing every other adult/child in the house. Now, consider every other item of personal property the parties might own. The couch, the TV,

Let me add one other thing to this. Generally, a divorce involves two parties with two lawyers. In a plural marriage, are we looking at adding the other spouses as parties and their lawyers? Whose interest have a right to be protected here?

I am seriously suggesting that the changes in the entire structure of divorce and probate law are a good reason to not rush into this idea. And most divorces don't take that long. dividing things in half takes considerably less time than trying to figure out how to protect the interests of the remaining multiple

Unless they maintain separate households for each spouse, assets get commingled. And given that there's an incentive to protect the collective, rather than the individual interests, commingling seems to be the way most of those marriages should go. if we go with your idea, it makes sense to muddy the waters so that

Here's what non-lawyers don't get about marriage, the license is the agreement with the state that in the event the marriage goes south, that the state will be the arbitrating body on the division of assets and the custody of children. The only other purpose a license serves is to make sure you don't marry your sister

"It is estimated that nearly two-thirds of Utah's 2.8 million residents are members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and Mormons dominate the state's legal and political circles. The Mormon church was also one of the leading forces behind California's short-lived ban on same-sex marriage."

The fans are already bitching online because she's not blonde. Tvline.com had a story on it this morning.

The photo is the difference. Fassbinder and Sheen may have engaged in heinous acts of abuse, but no one saw the victim of it like this. It's not race. It's that his crime is on display.

No, it doesn't. They can't fire you for a discriminatory reason, even in an at will employment state. And their defense doesn't get easier because of it.