I’m not this dude’s boss nor am I located or socially positioned in any way that will involve me in their disagreement so I can think whatever I want with zero consequences. It’s not my job to mollycoddle weird strangers on the internet who don’t want men to be guilty of crimes. And that is what we’re talking about…

Right - on the contrary, women who accuse men of assault or other creepy behavior often get pestered, harassed and generally treated like crap. Like name me ONE woman whose life got noticeably better after coming forward.

Majors’s aren’t just allegations. Take it from people who work in the industry and have had to work around that piece of shit for years.

I thought that about Cheeto-head.

“I see both sides of the vaccine situation... “

There is no “both sides” of a debate here. There’s the science and then there’s ignorant people with an oversized microphone making a lot of noise about something they don’t understand and refuse to learn about.

Honestly, this is a fight on sight if I’m Brian Austin Greene. Whoever this Robby Starbuck is should not be talking about someone’s children like this - it’s absolutely disgusting.

For a guy who named himself after a mediocre coffee chain and misspelled it (don't fact check me, facts don't matter here), he sure has opinions about other people's preferences. He should not be throwing stones, lest we make him change his first name to Peet. 

My take is that yes, neither dude is guilty until proved to be so, but let’s be real: when a famous showbiz dude gets accused of being a sex pest, it’s very rarely untrue. Remember when all those lady comics were like “Louis CK did weird sex stuff at me” and the entire rest of the comedy community was all “woah enough…

I guess they picked a writer who got a D+ in one semester of Spanish to decode the tweets. :/ And even if the tweets don’t give the full story, maybe consider waiting until you have a full story to report before breathlessly running to the printing press (an old-timey term, I know). I had to laugh at “The A.V. Club…

What a strange article. What does the podcast have to do with it? Was Huerta on the podcast?

Even better - that’s less than a fourth.

I would blame the AV Club’s practice of haphazardly paraphrasing Hollywood Reporter or Variety articles and often losing such vital information as “what happened and why” in the process, but in this case there doesn’t seem to be an original article to quasi-plagiarize.

I’M REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE WELL BEING OF CHILDREN SO I’M GOING TO BLAST THE PICUTRES AND IDENTIFIES OF THESE FREAK KIDS FOR EVERYONE TO RIDICULE

No. All she’s said is that her eldest has non-standard clothing preferences. It’s not clear what he identifies as, but it is fairly clear she doesn’t want to talk about it in public. From the Glamour article:

Hey guys...we pretty much take it for granted no one is responding to your request for comment.

Waiting for the classic trope where she removes her glasses and lets her hair down and snags the hot unobtainable guy in Plumbing...

Namor more like Nomor amirite?

I’m confused about how the podcast allegations fit into this? Doesn’t recording a podcast mean you grant consent for it to be aired? Who goes on a podcast like “we’re gonna sit here and talk in front of these microphones which are recording, but I don’t want you to air it”?  Is that the compensation part?  Did they…

Well, shit.  Marvel is having shitty luck with its casting lately.  First, Jonathan Majors’s abuse allegations, now this.  Bang up job, guys.

revenue is good but what are their costs?