I love Tenet. Its biggest problem is that to get the most of it, you have to watch it more than once. And if you don’t like it the first time, why would you watch it again?
I love Tenet. Its biggest problem is that to get the most of it, you have to watch it more than once. And if you don’t like it the first time, why would you watch it again?
Well-deserved and long overdue IMO.
Indirectly, to keep the movie rights for Spider-Man.
From the article above:
I prefer the name Vudu.
a partnership “could produce significant cost savings—from spending on programming to marketing—and create a more in-depth offering for consumers, especially with regard to live sports,” writes WSJ.
A source close to the production told The A.V. Club that Youssef never had a formal offer for Superman: Legacy
Also: Correlation is not causation.
I mostly agree with you and am happy to leave it at that. ...But the tweeting thing was just one example. He has been supporting Liberal candidates and expressing Liberal views for years before Twitter and 30 Rock. His political views have its own section on Wikipedia:
He is not known for being a Liberal because of the things he does; he’s known for talking about Liberal causes. He tweets Liberal things, vocally supports Liberal candidates, and generally says things that Liberals like to hear. He’s famous for it. Casting him as conservative CEO Jack Donaghy on 30 Rock was a…
Go for it, Chris. I’ll be there opening night.
I doubt that “players” really hate consolidation. The more companies consolidate, the greater the chance that a game or franchise that players like will come to a service they’re already subscribed to, like GamePass or PS Plus.
That ACTOR’S union contract doesn’t REQUIRE him to check the gun for bullets because safety protocols put the responsibility on other crew members. Those protocols have been in place for decades and work when they’re followed, and the actors union has already stated that it was not his responsibility.
Finally.
For someone who claims to not care about this case, you sure have a lot to say on this article alone.
And there it is. Nowhere did I say that the people at the top are responsible for bringing live ammo to set, or for leaving guns unattended, or for getting drunk or stoned while on the job. They did, however, create an unsafe work environment that was likely to result in injury sooner or later. A producer was…
I’m not convinced that the different mechanisms are sufficient, at least in this case. The safety violation fine was $100,000, which feels far too low to be punitive to me (and I assume that it’s not meant to be; the producers will probably just file an insurance claim). The fact that the most prominent lawsuit has…
That looks uncomfortable as hell.
The THR article includes a bit where they mention that the line producer chastised her for focusing too much on the armorer part of her job and not enough on the prop assisting part (which are normally two separate jobs to begin with). I think she’s still ultimately responsible (why was there live ammo on set to begin…
For me it’s not about feeling bad for her. Pointing out that the People In Charge can make reckless decisions doesn’t absolve her of her own responsibility, full stop. From what I’ve read, it sounds like she’s most likely the one who brought the live ammo to set. At best she knew that there were live rounds on set,…