I wrote my comment before seeing yours and I wrote something similar (although not as eloquently put); I reeeeeally want a breakdown of how this kind of behavior is seen as remotely healthy.

Will someone please explain the alleged “ownage” Vanessa Hudgens supposedly threw her ex’s way???? I’m not seein’ it...

The best part is them completely ignoring that Vanessa Hudgens is also dating somebody significantly younger than herself

“That’s one of the healthiest ways to deal with an ex who’s moved on with a 21-year-old.”

Ultimately, I’m glad Hudgens got in her comment on the whole matter, and hopefully she continues to laugh so hard that she cries. That’s one of the healthiest ways to deal with an ex who’s moved on with a 21-year-old.

“We were able to stop the hip gyrations but I’m afraid the vocal changes are permanent. Do you understand what we’re telling you?”

“Uh-huh-huh.”

I dont get why everyone is upset he said “friend”. In stories about my exes I usually just say “friend” to make it less complicated. Stop getting upset at everything and cancling people over stupid sh*t

Absolutely. That doesn’t mean she wasn’t in love with him. The two aren’t mutually exclusive, unfortunately.

Or maybe she was genuinely in love with him and she knows her feelings better than someone else and isn’t confusing intensity with love, which you seem to be assuming she is?

I mean, trafficking victims traditionally aren’t people with tons of money or options in the first place. I can’t imagine a life experience bad enough that Andrew Tate looks good by comparison, but that just makes me lucky. I’m sure it exists.

Come on, people. Where would the Science, Space and Technology committee be without the first man to set foot on the moon?

For real. Imagine the shit that guy’s bodyguard must have seen and ignored, if not actively participated in.

Exactly, of course, he’s like minded with those two vile pieces of human excrement. Right now, so called guard is gonna milk it for his 15 minutes a a fist full of $$.

“Young and stupid” ≠ okay to abuse and rape.

Just as an important piece of context, McCarthy has been promising retaliatory committee removals against the Dems, namely for Reps. Schiff (CA-28), Swalwell (CA-14) and Omar (MN-5).

honestly, hes the guy that works for tate, im thinking that deficient moral standards are kind of the thing.

The only way to stop a baby with a gun is a good baby with a gun.

The child was walking around with the gun, on the landing, making “pew pew” noises.  I don’t think it’s out of line for the cop to ask the little ‘un where daddy keeps the pew-pew, if that’s something this pre-schooler can relate to.

Isn’t the legal definition of “loaded” almost always a loaded magazine whether or not the chamber is loaded?

Seems like an ELI5 is a year too late... So, a pew pew has a bunch of different, er... rooms. The Magazine is like a bullet’s sleepy time place, where they wait quietly so daddy doesn’t get angry. The Chamber is like the landing, where, when someone opens the front door, the bullet wanders around alone, ready to head…