Isn’t there a greater than 0% chance this is a sick hoax?

In fairness, if people thought the Hillary followers were voting on women’s issues, they wouldn’t say they were voting with their vagina (bear with me here). The voting with their vagina thing is about the perception that both candidates are the same on women’s issues, while Bernie is more like a Democrat on war and…

Except Avery was about suppressed evidence and DNA evidence that couldn’t be tested in a way to prove his innocence at the time of the crime. There’s no crooked trial here. There’s no lack of evidence. There’s no technology to catch up to the crime. He fucking raped those women and told them no one would believe them…

A lot of people are defending what you wrote by saying you’re only speaking about your own experience.

"Some conferences ban them because both men and women find their existence offensive; not because they're trying to "satisfy their hollow egos" (Peacock apparently fancies himself Freud, doesn't he?) but because, as Kotaku's Kate Cox puts it, anti-booth babe policies "foster an environment where women are around to…